vapoursynth requires nasm >= 2.13.01

[4re]

vapoursynth requires nasm >= 2.13.01

[4re]

I see, that is a leftover from the old past... Gonna fix it right now, thx for pointing it out.

[4re]

Fixed, thanks for the report.

[EoD]

@4re How did you fix it?

I still get the same error with media-libs/vapoursynth-39

/bin/sh ./libtool  --mode=compile --tag=CC nasm -DARCH_X86_64=1 -DPIC -f elf64 -I./include/ -w -Worphan-labels -Wunrecognized-char -Dprivate_prefix=vs -o src/core/asm/x86/check.lo src/core/asm/x86/check.asm -prefer-non-pic
libtool: compile:  nasm -DARCH_X86_64=1 -DPIC -f elf64 -I./include/ -w -Worphan-labels -Wunrecognized-char -Dprivate_prefix=vs src/core/asm/x86/check.asm -o src/core/asm/x86/.libs/check.o
nasm: error: invalid warning `Worphan-labels'
nasm: error: invalid warning `unrecognized-char'
type `nasm -h' for help
make: *** [Makefile:2007: src/core/asm/x86/check.lo] Error 1

[4re]

Making the ebuild install the appropriate nasm version for vapoursynth to build?
What version of nasm is installed in your system?

[EoD]

=================================================================
                        Package Settings
=================================================================

dev-lang/nasm-2.12.01::gentoo was built with the following:
USE="-doc" ABI_X86="(64)"
CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=native"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -march=native"

and the new vapoursynth package does not pull in a new nasm version.

vapoursynth-portage/media-libs/vapoursynth/vapoursynth-39.ebuild

Lines 53 to 62 in 2f7ed1e

	DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
	amd64? ( dev-lang/nasm )
	>=dev-python/cython-0.24.1
	doc? (
	dev-python/sphinx[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
	dev-python/sphinxcontrib-websupport[${PYTHON_USEDEP}]
	)
	virtual/pkgconfig
	x86? ( >=dev-lang/nasm-2.13.01 )
	"

[4re]

Are your repos / overlays up to date? That version is too old and it is not possible portage is trying to build vapoursynth without previously bumping nasm to 2.13.01.

[EoD]

@4re please see my post above. The error is in line 54 in the ebuild. It also does look wrong that you have a separate line 54 and line 61.