Smiley instead of a bold result

[adnbsr]

Smiley instead of a bold result

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Just tested the makeBold() and makeItalic() methods with e.g.:
return " *\u00a0" + in + "\u00a0* ";
But at least my jabber client (gajim) show then no bold or italic text.

Original comment by [email protected] on 20 Jan 2011 at 5:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Jan 2011 at 6:28

• Changed state: WaitingForRelease

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Fixed in 1.7.3

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Jan 2011 at 8:07

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

FYI: Some jabber clients wont show the bold/italic text if there is a 
whitespace before/after the */?. I could reproduce this behavior, with 2 of my 
clients: gajim and psi.

Original comment by [email protected] on 23 Jan 2011 at 10:57

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I've just added a leading space for the ending star " * ". Do you have the bug 
with the 1.7.3 with the help command for example ?

Original comment by [email protected] on 23 Jan 2011 at 11:23

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Yes, this was with 1.7.3 and the help command. The leading space breaks the 
bold for me.

Original comment by [email protected] on 23 Jan 2011 at 11:29

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by [email protected] on 23 Jan 2011 at 11:51

• Changed state: New

[GoogleCodeExporter]

finally won't fix.
We now use XHTML formatting.
If your xmpp client doesn't support XHTML, it will show old formatting.
But old formatting by using * or _ is more a trick than a real feature because 
all xmpp clients manage that in different ways...

Original comment by [email protected] on 2 Feb 2011 at 9:06

• Changed state: WontFix

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 86 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by [email protected] on 8 Feb 2011 at 2:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

There are many clients which do not support xhtml messages. This goes for the 
two I tested: Psi and Miranda.
However, a way better way, even as workaround, is using BBcode. I now use 
gTalkSMS like this and am happy with it.



XmppMsg.java:108

public String generateFmtTxt() {
    return _message.toString()
        .replaceAll(FontBegin, "")
        .replaceAll(BoldBegin, " [b]")
        .replaceAll(BoldEnd, "[/b] ")
        .replaceAll(ItalicBegin, " [u]")
        .replaceAll(ItalicEnd, "[/u] ");
}

Original comment by [email protected] on 10 Feb 2011 at 2:10

[GoogleCodeExporter]

BBCode appears to be specific to the MSN protocol, and pidgin doesn't support 
it.  Does the gtalk UI support it?  If not, I'd have to recommend we do not go 
this route.

Original comment by [email protected] on 10 Feb 2011 at 11:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Both formating styles have it's disadvantages. Only the user can decide which 
fits best. Making this an option is at as easy as an if else block.
I am in favour of an additional option, as it turns out that there are XMPP 
clients out there, that dont proper support xhtml. But first we have to 
reorganised the settings.

Original comment by [email protected] on 11 Feb 2011 at 7:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Agreed, an option to select the preferred non-xhtml formatting would be perfect.

Original comment by [email protected] on 11 Feb 2011 at 11:57