Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

write the reply text to reviewers. about phasedelay HOT 5 OPEN

timm avatar timm commented on August 18, 2024
write the reply text to reviewers.

from phasedelay.

Comments (5)

timm avatar timm commented on August 18, 2024

Bill, please confirm: are the above (a) changes you've made in the body of the paper or (b) in replies to reviewers or (c) both

hint: hoping for (c)

from phasedelay.

WilliamNichols avatar WilliamNichols commented on August 18, 2024

Both. If I put it into 47, I also modified the paper. Took a break now will get back to it

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 11, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Tim Menzies <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Bill, please confirm: are the above (a) changes you've made in the body of the paper or (b) in replies to reviewers or (c) both

hint: hoping for (c)


You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/47#issuecomment-246197276, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHOyVANHK19-mzgzY0kRMD4LBx-K9FAdks5qpE8jgaJpZM4J4nOy.

from phasedelay.

WilliamNichols avatar WilliamNichols commented on August 18, 2024

Actually with respect to reply to reviewer, I put the text in 47, is there some document in which she would like it to be included?

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 11, 2016, at 2:57 PM, Tim Menzies <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Bill, please confirm: are the above (a) changes you've made in the body of the paper or (b) in replies to reviewers or (c) both

hint: hoping for (c)


You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/47#issuecomment-246197276, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHOyVANHK19-mzgzY0kRMD4LBx-K9FAdks5qpE8jgaJpZM4J4nOy.

from phasedelay.

WilliamNichols avatar WilliamNichols commented on August 18, 2024

Reply R2.1
Much of the added data has been included for context. We considered complimenting with defects, but the distribution tracks closely enough with LOC that it was not interesting.

from phasedelay.

WilliamNichols avatar WilliamNichols commented on August 18, 2024

Reply to R1.3
We apologize for the confusion. We have rewritten this paragraph to be more understandable. The key point is that we measure defects both directly and by summing effort in defect removal phases. The total removal phases produce a greater cost estimate by including overhead.

from phasedelay.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.