Defining JSON body using native RAML?

[an2deg]

Defining JSON body using native RAML?

[fireantology]

Hi Diego,
If we look at XML for example there you use XML schema definition that are also something defined outside of RAML and not part of RAML itself. Furthermore the transport schema (json, xml, ecc.) could also be extended to some proprietary form of communication like EDIFACT (standard for transportation industries) or even some custom text files.
I know this is not common and most of people will always use JSON or XML but it's logical to don't add this definition in RAML specs, this keeps RAML independent from transport format.
This are my 2 cents :-)

Regards

[postatum]

Hi @relaxdiego
Thanks for bringing up this topic. I agree with everything @fireantology said :)
But i think the better place to discuss this would be RAML forums.

Thanks

[relaxdiego]

Thanks for the responses. I'd forgotten about this question until I got the notification. I also found that the RAML team is working on making this happen for v1.0: raml-org/raml-spec#116