The RPM package is not noarch

[api7]

The RPM package is not noarch

[membphis]

Which cloud platform do you use for ARM compilation?

[Fuchange]

@membphis I build it on my local ARM server.

If I build it locally, it's OK.

[imjoey]

Which cloud platform do you use for ARM compilation?

Hi @membphis , we are using a physical server with Kunpeng 920.

[membphis]

@idbeta do you have time to look at this issue?

[idbeta]

@idbeta do you have time to look at this issue?

Yes, but I don’t have this kind of environment now, I will verify after finding the environment.

[idbeta]

I note that apisix-2.1 provided a noarch rpm package,

But it contains some binaries files built on X86_64 and caused the apifix command cant find the file at ARM system.

Like apache/apisix#issue-691844591.

# file ./local/apisix/deps/lib/lua/5.1/lfs.so
./local/apisix/deps/lib/lua/5.1/lfs.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=5de2ad9d73ddbdaa91151ddfee3eef545a010902, not stripped

Would you like to add some options to fpm in run.sh to buind different arch packages?
Or I can provided an spec file to build packages by rpmbuild command ?

I got your point, the RPM package provided now is indeed not noarch, the name needs to be changed. @moonming

[imjoey]

I note that apisix-2.1 provided a noarch rpm package,
But it contains some binaries files built on X86_64 and caused the apifix command cant find the file at ARM system.
Like apache/apisix#issue-691844591.

# file ./local/apisix/deps/lib/lua/5.1/lfs.so
./local/apisix/deps/lib/lua/5.1/lfs.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=5de2ad9d73ddbdaa91151ddfee3eef545a010902, not stripped

Would you like to add some options to fpm in run.sh to buind different arch packages?
Or I can provided an spec file to build packages by rpmbuild command ?

I got your point, the RPM package provided now is indeed not noarch, the name needs to be changed. @moonming

@idbeta yep, exactly. We are supposed to make independent rpms for each cpu arch platforms, x86_64 and aarch64 for now.

I guess @Fuchange and I could help to commit a pr to fix this issue.

@idbeta We are working to bring OpenResty as well as APISIX to openEuler community, please refer to https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/1240 for details. Welcome to join us.

[idbeta]

@idbeta yep, exactly. We are supposed to make independent rpms for each cpu arch platforms, x86_64 and aarch64 for now.

I guess @Fuchange and I could help to commit a pr to fix this issue.

@idbeta We are working to bring OpenResty as well as APISIX to openEuler community, please refer to https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/1240 for details. Welcome to join us.

Thanks, I will go to your community to learn.

[Fuchange]

@membphis @idbeta

Hello everyone ,I submitted a pr(#4) to fix it ,pls have a look~

[membphis]

nice, many thx @Fuchange