1.0.6 BC break?

[ardalis]

1.0.6 BC break?

[ardalis]

I wasn't applying tags until this version, sorry. Do you have an example of a non-struct TValue you could share?

[mcrio]

Hi Ardalis, 1.0.5 doesn't have the struct constraint on TValue.
Seems it was introduced here: 1c9bf3e#diff-b71ca71881242d3857a980ff13d4309dR34

[ardalis]

Right, that was a major PR introduced by @aalmada which had a big positive perf impact. What negative impact are you seeing from the constraint? What scenario is it limiting?

Remember SmartEnum's primary goal is replacing the standard enum type and making it better by having each option be a class rather than a primitive. A standard enum can only be a very short list of types:

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/keywords/enum

The approved types for an enum are byte, sbyte, short, ushort, int, uint, long, or ulong.

[mcrio]

Thanks. I was using it with string values.
I don't have a large codebase depending on SmartEnum and string as a value so I can get away with refactoring the code.

[ardalis]

Ok, thanks. Of course if you stick with 1.0.5 you should be fine, too. Unless I hear that this is breaking a lot of other people, though, I think I'm fine to have SmartEnum expect a struct Value going forward.