Provide log4jdbc as a maven artifact

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Provide log4jdbc as a maven artifact

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by [email protected] on 15 Jun 2011 at 2:07

• Added labels: Priority-Low, Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Priority-Medium, Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I don't agree with Priority-Low - it really is not so much work to do.
Deploying log4jdbc into maven repository helps many developers.

https://docs.sonatype.org/display/Repository/Sonatype+OSS+Maven+Repository+Usage
+Guide#SonatypeOSSMavenRepositoryUsageGuide-5.Prerequisites

Original comment by [email protected] on 26 Nov 2011 at 2:17

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I disagree this is low priority too. It is not much work and very helpful. 
Thanks.

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Mar 2012 at 6:13

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It's very low priority for me, because I don't need it.  If someone were to 
submit a high quality and well tested patch, it might have a better chance of 
getting done sooner.

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Mar 2012 at 1:06

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I can see you don’t need it, but it would help spread this delightful piece 
of software. We have a policy only to include Maven artifacts in our projects, 
and not to include JARs manually. (Luckily, we also have a private repository, 
and I happen to know the admin.)

Original comment by MichaelPiefel on 29 Mar 2012 at 7:04

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Is anyone working on this one yet?

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Aug 2012 at 11:03

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

How can you still work without Maven???

Original comment by [email protected] on 10 Oct 2012 at 3:03

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sorry, I know a lot of people love and depend on Maven, but every time I've 
tried to use it it gets in the way and frustrates me. Adn these days I'm not 
doing a lot of active java development and am super busy so I don't have any 
real incentive to implement this.  So if you want it, pitch in and build a high 
quality maven pom, go and do the work to submit it to archives, etc. on your 
own. Thanks.

Original comment by [email protected] on 10 Oct 2012 at 3:18

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

"Maven sucks!"

Yes and Maven is the only tool that uses maven repos

Original comment by [email protected] on 14 Oct 2012 at 8:05

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

maven does suck pretty bad....try gradle which does produce maven 
artifacts....it is like ant combined with gradle on steroids and much better 
than maven.

Original comment by [email protected] on 30 Nov 2013 at 1:30

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[GoogleCodeExporter]

errrrr, I meant "ant combined with maven" on steroids fixing all the weird 
maven issues.

Original comment by [email protected] on 30 Nov 2013 at 1:31

• Added labels: ****
• Removed labels: ****

[Jurrie]

If people still want this, please look at https://github.com/hohonuuli/log4jdbc