Watermark is incorrectly placed on the foreground of included PDFs

[callegar]

Watermark is incorrectly placed on the foreground of included PDFs

[callegar]

Draftwatermark by current standards has many limitations. One of them is that you cannot fine control the "depth" where the watermark is placed.
Fixing this issue would require a thorough rewrite of the code, that unfortuntately cannot be on my radar due to lack of time.
My suggestion is to use Koma script scrlayer to achieve the desired goals in all cases where draftwatermark is currently insufficient.

[callegar]

Can you please provide a little testcase? I am currently updating the draftwatermark package and if possible I would like to take the occasion to look into this matter.

[callegar]

A new version of draftwatermark is out (release 3.0). On new LaTeX formats (Autumn 2020) it uses a different mechanism to put the watermark on the page. This should assure that the watermark is actually always on the background. If you have a new enough LaTeX system, can you give it a try and report back?

[jamesg-mit]

Hi Sergio, Thank you very much for your contributions and the draftwatermark package.

I believe I have a reasonable MWE test case that shows the issue when pdfpages is used with draftwatermark. Here the watermark is placed on top of the included PDF but behind other files.

MWE tex file

\documentclass[]{article}

%Packages 
\usepackage{pdfpages}
\usepackage[stamp,color=red!10]{draftwatermark}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % use T1 encoded fonts in output -- 256 glyphs vs. 128, also <> symbols work
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % allow for utf8 encoding in the .tex files
\usepackage{lmodern} % use latin modern font (updated replacement vs. cm), have to load AFTER fontenc

\begin{document}
\textbf{Watermark is under the text}
\lipsum[1-3]
\textbf{In the following page, the watermark is over the inserted PDF:}
\clearpage

\includepdf[pages={1-},		    %Select pages from 3 onward to end
	scale=0.86,					%Tweak scale to fit within margin of output. 0.86 is max to fit
	trim=1in 1in 1in 1in, clip, %[left bot right top]: Clip off margins of source doc, 1" margins
	landscape=false, angle=0,   %don't use landscape or rotate
	frame=true,                 %add frame (may be turned off)
	pagecommand={}]             %Needed to prevent empty page format (which deletes template headers/footers)
	{test_include.pdf}   %Included file
\end{document}

Test PDF to include
test_include.pdf

Resulting PDF
watermark_example.pdf
Build info:

pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.23 (MiKTeX 21.10) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2021.10.12)
pdfpages.sty    2021/03/06 v0.5t Insert pages of external PDF documents (AM)
draftwatermark.sty    2020/12/08 3.0 Put a gray textual watermark on document pages```

[dseddah]

Hi, thanks for this very cool package.
It would very cool to have an option to make sure that the watermark would be on top of everything. For example, i'm having imported graphs as pdf images through includegraphics and the watermark is below the image but above the text :(

[callegar]

@jamesg-mit

With a long delay, a fix/workaround is in the works.

In case you are interested in som inner details, I hoped that pdfpages would have moved to use the new LaTeX hooks framework directly rather than depending on eso-pic which could have enabled a more robust solution to the problem. As is, it is unclear to me if placing a workaround in draftwatermark could break something else depending on eso-pic.

As a temporary workaround for your case, please try adding

\DeclareHookRule {shipout/background}{draftwatermark}{<}{eso-pic}

before \begin{document}

[callegar]

Workaround is in R3.3

[jamesg-mit]

@callegar I really would like to thank you. The new package and work around work great for my application.

I also noticed that I can flip the less-than to greater-than operator to force the watermark on top and thought that was pretty neat.