Utility to autogenerate a terraform module

[sed-i]

Utility to autogenerate a terraform module

[syncronize-issues-to-jira]

Thank you for reporting us your feedback!

The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/CRAFT-2492.

This message was autogenerated

[gatici]

Thanks @sed-i for opening the issue. That's great idea to generate Terraform modules of each charm by the help of charmcraft. As a Telco team, we manually produced the Terraform modules for each SD-Core charms as we are aiming to replace the bundles with high level Terraform modules.

We tried to keep the things as much as generic to reduce the maintenance cost. For example, used monolithic configuration instead of expanding each config parameters. However, we still need to maintain the relation endpoints manually.

The charms' Terraform modules could be used in the integration tests. Setting a an integration environment and testing the scenarios using Terraform will be quite straightforward.

The Terraform module's structure seems explicit. I hope it will be feasible to generate them automatically.

[Gmerold]

I think it would be really cool to have it. This would significantly minimize the effort of creating modules.
And it should also have a corresponding GitHub action too ;)

Having that said, I see two things worth mentioning:

1. Creating Terraform modules for bundles - While we could have them generated based on the bundle.yaml, it doesn't make any sense to create a bundle just to replace with a Terraform module :) This part would probably have to stay manual.

2. Publishing our modules to the public Terraform registry - Generating Terraform modules based on metadata.yaml of the charm means that the Terraform module will live in the charm repo. This means we won't be able to publish our modules to the public Terraform registry (it has specific requirements for the repository name, which we don't meet). To reuse the module, we'll have to source it from Git directly. Probably not a big deal, but worth noting. Perhaps, at some point, Canonical could host a private registry?