Linch-pin feedback

[centos-paas-sig]

Linch-pin feedback

[greg-hellings]

Documentation is a constant work-in-progress. We know we are woefully behind on that. Until about 2 weeks ago we had no docs, so we're trying to make steady progress on that!

Inconsistent field naming: Can you open a new issue to address this, specifically? This really is a bug and should be captured by some concerted work after a standard is decided upon.

As for the other items you bring up:

The lack of a top level namespace for the Python package components is captured in issue #133

The credentials problem has been raised before. We are working on a solution to credentials across the board, captured in #76

Debugging to a log file is already captured by #146

[jlebon]

Documentation is a constant work-in-progress. We know we are woefully behind on that. Until about 2 weeks ago we had no docs, so we're trying to make steady progress on that!

Sounds good. This is by far the biggest issue I encountered.

Inconsistent field naming: Can you open a new issue to address this, specifically? This really is a bug and should be captured by some concerted work after a standard is decided upon.

OK, I created #149. I'll close this now, since all the other ones are captured in issues.

Thanks!

[samvarankashyap]

@jlebon : Thank you for the feedback . We will working on the fixes. All the issues pointed out will be fixed in no time.