Make schema matching easier

[chancancode]

Make schema matching easier

[pda]

That looks pretty awesome to me.

I like the #fuzzy, #repeated etc methods, too.

What do you think about replacing anything and nothing with match.anything and match.nothing, so that only match needs to be included into the RSpec/whatever namespace?

[chancancode]

Haven't considered that one, I like the suggestion! In that case the signature of match would have to be def match(*args) ... end to properly distinguish between match(nil) vs match(), which presumably returns a DSLProxy object or something similar which lets you call anything/nothing etc on it. 

I need to think a little but more about the drawbacks of returning proxy objects in general, eg how to report "dangling proxy objects" errors, etc. But I am pretty sure those could be worked out. 

Thanks for the feedback!
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Paul Annesley [email protected]
wrote:

That looks pretty awesome to me.
I like the #fuzzy, #repeated etc methods, too.

What do you think about replacing anything and nothing with match.anything and match.nothing, so that only match needs to be included into the RSpec/whatever namespace?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#18 (comment)

[Amnesthesia]

Is this happening?