prevalence.msm censtime question

[slee-101]

prevalence.msm censtime question

[chjackson]

It's not clear why you'd expect the state 4 totals to decrease after reaching censtime? The constant value you see is the number of people who have died before censtime. Those who die after censtime don't get added to this total, but we don't "forget about" the people whose deaths we have observed under the assumed observation scheme. Is there a sentence in the help file with a misleading wording?

[slee-101]

Thank you for the explanation. In this document on page 34 is where I am confused. If a patient dies at time point 20 and would only follow up to time point 30 if alive, how would we "forget" about this death at t=30? https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/vignettes/msm-manual.pdf  Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

…

________________________________ From: Chris Jackson ***@***.***> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2024 4:11:26 AM To: chjackson/msm ***@***.***> Cc: Lee, Steven ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [chjackson/msm] prevalence.msm censtime question (Issue #94) ***CAUTION:*** This email is not from a BCM Source. Only click links or open attachments you know are safe.

________________________________ It's not clear why you'd expect the state 4 totals to decrease after reaching censtime? The constant value you see is the number of people who have died before censtime. Those who die after censtime don't get added to this total, but we don't "forget about" the people whose deaths we have observed under the assumed observation scheme. Is there a sentence in the help file with a misleading wording? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_chjackson_msm_issues_94-23issuecomment-2D1949924161&d=DwMCaQ&c=ZQs-KZ8oxEw0p81sqgiaRA&r=mkIWzf69G9bkvQtxlldsvUM6islUIC9UIbi0XRM469Y&m=Ebv6U-_Ro9y3T2L949M7zqT6Lgj-2AmulhxHoGp0_wVvH4crjuniLtl_Sp38bzwF&s=BdzdO-AOeW4Ep5xjQVR8rNOagI_5DoGMwcwXT2A7yqY&e=>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_ASLKPS4APC55OZDREY4LTKDYUB645AVCNFSM6AAAAABDMJ625WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNBZHEZDIMJWGE&d=DwMCaQ&c=ZQs-KZ8oxEw0p81sqgiaRA&r=mkIWzf69G9bkvQtxlldsvUM6islUIC9UIbi0XRM469Y&m=Ebv6U-_Ro9y3T2L949M7zqT6Lgj-2AmulhxHoGp0_wVvH4crjuniLtl_Sp38bzwF&s=yxPYdok_13JmW9ehcKl_E-l21b13Cu6jBFcnoIIm01s&e=>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[chjackson]

Deaths for people in the data who die after censtime are not included in the counts of death after censtime. However deaths before censtime are included in the counts of deaths both before and after censtime. So the count can't go up, but it can't go down either. If a person dies before their censtime, we don't exclude them from the count after censtime, because we are trying to imitate how a similar dataset might be observed in real life - if we observed that a person died before the end of the study we would know they are dead forever.

[slee-101]

Got it. Thank you! Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

…

________________________________ From: Chris Jackson ***@***.***> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2024 9:36:47 AM To: chjackson/msm ***@***.***> Cc: Lee, Steven ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [chjackson/msm] prevalence.msm censtime question (Issue #94) ***CAUTION:*** This email is not from a BCM Source. Only click links or open attachments you know are safe.

________________________________ Deaths for people in the data who die after censtime are not included in the counts of death after censtime. However deaths before censtime are included in the counts of deaths both before and after censtime. So the count can't go up, but it can't go down either. If a person dies before their censtime, we don't exclude them from the count after censtime, because we are trying to imitate how a similar dataset might be observed in real life - if we observed that a person died before the end of the study we would know they are dead forever. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_chjackson_msm_issues_94-23issuecomment-2D1950238121&d=DwMCaQ&c=ZQs-KZ8oxEw0p81sqgiaRA&r=mkIWzf69G9bkvQtxlldsvUM6islUIC9UIbi0XRM469Y&m=YdCnlNbOBIKBx52oVRBtCLXtwe8SIjg_ZAmcP1PgK0G72qCsOFcW2OKDlJ2Lo8jA&s=5ByyOIUOMT2VLxLeOUxhmVNKP8E1lhp4y49w9M645Qg&e=>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_ASLKPS2AQKGQ5HMUYGBQ4TLYUDFA7AVCNFSM6AAAAABDMJ625WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNJQGIZTQMJSGE&d=DwMCaQ&c=ZQs-KZ8oxEw0p81sqgiaRA&r=mkIWzf69G9bkvQtxlldsvUM6islUIC9UIbi0XRM469Y&m=YdCnlNbOBIKBx52oVRBtCLXtwe8SIjg_ZAmcP1PgK0G72qCsOFcW2OKDlJ2Lo8jA&s=uZlPhrswoi4uUQGbxvmCG0VheBQYwEsoCFq6TIR15qI&e=>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>