Recreating annotations.xml

[klosoter]

Recreating annotations.xml

[klosoter]

@rkjtan and @jonathanrobie, how should we proceed?

[rkjtan]

Any cases of implied articles that have no corresponding node from the full tree should be cases where only the OSHB reads the implied articles. If we want to add annotations to them, the implied article would be wrapped in Cat="art" node and the article plus the noun phrase it modifies would be wrapped in a Cat="np" Rule="DetNP" node. It would look like the following:

          <Node Cat="PP" Rule="Pp2PP" Head="0" nodeId="0104302000610031">
            <Node Cat="pp" Rule="PrepNp" Head="1" nodeId="0104302000610030">
              <Node Cat="pp" Rule="P2PP" Head="0" nodeId="0104302000610011">
                <Node n="010430200061" Cat="prep" morphId="010430200061" Unicode="בַּ" nodeId="0104302000610010">
                  <m n="010430200061" morph="Rd" lang="H" lemma="b" pos="preposition">בַּ</m>
                </Node>
              </Node>
              <Node **Cat="np" Rule="DetNP"** Head="1" nodeId="0104302000610020">
                <Node n="010430200061ה" **Cat="art"** morphId="010430200062" Unicode="" nodeId="0104302000610010">
                  <m n="010430200061ה" morph="Td" lemma="d" lang="H" pos="particle" type="definite article"/>
                </Node>
                <Node Cat="np" Rule="N2NP" Head="0" nodeId="0104302000620011">
                  <Node n="010430200062" Cat="noun" morphId="010430200063" Unicode="תְּחִלָּ֖ה" nodeId="0104302000620010">
                    <m n="010430200062" morph="Ncfsa" lang="H" lemma="8462" after=" " pos="noun" type="common" gender="feminine" number="singular" state="absolute">תְּחִלָּ֖ה</m>
                  </Node>
                </Node>
              </Node>
            </Node>
          </Node>

[jonathanrobie]

These are the cases we encountered when mapping OSHB onto the WHM trees. Randall just posted this to Slack, I thought I should put it here for future reference.

JONATHAN HAS TO TREAT AS SPECIAL CASES:
Jonathan just needs to ignore mismatch (match Qere of OSHB to WHM despite one consonant difference):
ne5:7 נֹשִׁ֑ים OSHB added a Qere (WHM reading is simply the OSHB Ketiv, with no corresponding Qere)
ps21:2 יָּ֥גֶל OSHB added a Qere (WHM reading is simply the OSHB Ketiv, with no corresponding Qere)
da2:39 אֲרַע OSHB added a Qere (WHM reading is simply the OSHB Ketiv, with no corresponding Qere)
Despite having one consonant difference the OSHB Qere simply needs to be matched to the corresponding WhM words that are similar (though not identical)
DONE TODAY TO MATCH OSHB:
ADDED PREPOSITION TO TREE SKELETON:
gn38:24 כְּמִשְׁלֹ֣שׁ can't have 2 prepositions in a row (but OSHB purposely chose this & has a note) 
REMOVED PARAGOGIC H SUFFIX NODE FROM TREE SKELETON:
ju19:13 OSHB doesn't read paragogic h (which Westminster does) in agreement with BHQ's reading of Leningrad Codex
REMOVED DEFINITE ARTICLE NODE FROM TREE SKELETON:
1c2:52 OSHB different interpretation with just noun starting with h vs WHM article and noun
CHANGED TREE SKELETON TO PREPOSITION WITH INFINITIVE CONSTRUCT CLAUSE:
1c5:9 Cf. below. Second problem (account for WHM treating לְב֣וֹא as one word) after first problem below fixed (לְב֣וֹא lemma should be "l/935" instead)  
Also changed 2c26:8 in the same way as 1c5:9 (even though 2c26:8 doesn't show up in the original problem list as it should end up being a mismatch unless this change is done) 
ADDED ARTICLE NODE TO TREE SKELETON:
er4:9 OSHB different interpretation with noun and article vs WHM just noun 
REMOVED KETIV NODE FROM TREE SKELETON:
pr19:7 לא Ketiv appears in WHM trees, exception where both Ketiv and Qere were read to try to make sense of difficult passage 
ADDED NOUN NODE TO TREE SKELETON AND REINTERPRETED AS NPOFNP 
ca8:6 שַׁלְהֶ֥בֶתְיָֽה OSHB 2 parts separately analyzed vs WHM analyzed as one word
PREVIOUSLY DONE TO MATCH OSHB:
ADDED IMPLIED ARTICLE IN SYNTAX TREE SKELETON:
gn18:10 כָּעֵ֣ת WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
gn18:14 כָּעֵ֣ת  WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
ex7:11  לַֽחֲכָמִ֖ים conjoined to unambiguous וְלַֽמְכַשְּׁפִ֑ים WHM should add implied article like OSHB? Joel: Yes 
ju19:21 לַחֲמוֹרִ֑ים WHM should add implied article? Joel: Yes 
ru2:7 בָֽעֳמָרִ֔ים WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
1s19:10 בַּֽחֲנִית֙ WHM should add implied article (before heh and ḥet that are not qamats-pointed – the definite article remains pointed with a pataḥ without “compensation for a” dagesh) Joel: Yes 
1s26:8 בַּחֲנִ֤ית WHM should add implied article Joel: More likely No, but yes acceptable. 
1s28:6 בַּחֲלֹמ֛וֹת WHM should add implied article? Joel: Either 
1s28:15 בַּ֣חֲלֹמ֔וֹת WHM should add implied article? Joel: Either 
1k7:8 לָֽאוּלָ֔ם WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
1k18:28 בַּחֲרָב֖וֹת WHM should add implied article like OSHB? Joel: Yes 
2k4:16 כָּעֵ֣ת WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes  
2k4:17 כָּעֵ֣ת WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes  
2c19:8 וְלָרִ֑יב WHM should add implied article? (Ambiguous as When the inseparable preposition is attached immediately before the tone syllable of a word in pause, the pointing under the preposition is sometimes lengthened to a qamets) Joel: No 
er3:10 בַּחֲצֹֽצְר֗וֹת WHM should add implied article like OSHB? Joel: Yes 
es1:13 לַחֲכָמִ֖ים WHM should add implied article like OSHB? Joel: Yes 
jb4:20 לָעֶ֣רֶב WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb13:8 לָאֵ֥ל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb14:7 לָעֵ֗ץ WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb19:10 כָּ֝עֵ֗ץ WHM should add implied article Joel: Reserve judgment 
jb21:14 לָ֭אֵל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb22:17 לָ֭אֵל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb31:28 לָאֵ֣ל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb33:6 לָאֵ֑ל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb34:10 לָאֵ֥ל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
jb34:37 לָאֵֽל׃ WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
ps57:3 לָ֝אֵ֗ל WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
pr24:5 בַּע֑וֹז WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
pr25:3 לָ֭רוּם WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
pr26:3 לַחֲמ֑וֹר WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
pr28:22 לַה֗וֹן WHM should add implied article (changed mind after previously having this for OSHB to omit article)
ec9:11 לַחֲכָמִ֥ים WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
ca1:10 בַּחֲרוּזִֽים׃ WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
is14:6 בָאַף֙ WHM should add implied article Joel: No 
ek20:1 בַּחֲמִשָּׁ֣ה WHM should add implied article like OSHB? Joel: Yes 
ek37:9 בַּהֲרוּגִ֥ים הָאֵ֖לֶּה WHM should add implied article Joel: Yes 
hb2:19 לָעֵץ֙ WHM should add implied article Joel: No, but yes acceptable 
REMOVED IMPLIED ARTICLE IN WESTMINSTER TREE SKELETON:
ju9:41 בָּארוּמָ֑ה OSHB should change R to Rd (previously confirmed by both of Joel & Randall) Joüon §103b says strong vocalization exception. So, remove implied article in WHM? 
CHANGED WESTMINSTER TREE SKELETON FROM PREPOSITION AND PRONOMINAL SUFFIX (TWO LEAF NODES) TO PARTICLE OF ENTREATY INTERPRETATION (ONE LEAF NODE)
gn43:20, gn44:18, ex4:10, ex4:13, nu12:11, js7:8, ju6:13, ju6:15, ju13:8, 1s1:26, 1k3:17, 1k3:26
REMOVED KETIV ACCIDENTALLY LEFT IN WESTMINSTER TREE SKELETON PREVIOUSLY (DUE TO NOT ACCOUNTING FOR QERE READING SIMPLY BEING BLANK, INDICATING TO OMIT KETIV):
ru3:12 אם 
2k5:18 נא 
je38:16 את 
je39:12 אם
je51:3 ידרך
ek48:16 חמש
SEPARATED INTO TWO LEAF NODES OF PREP AND ADV JUST LIKE WHEN THIS WORD IS SPELLED WITH MAQQEF IN BETWEEN THE TWO MORPHEMES: 
1c20:4 אַחֲרֵיכֵ֔ן 
2c20:1 אַֽחֲרֵיכֵ֡ן (Meteg on aleph just can't be on the left side for some reason, even when I copy from a source that has it on the left--pasting using Notepad++ or Notepad results in meteg appearing on the right of the patah vowel)
2c20:35 וְאַחֲרֵיכֵ֗ן
2c24:4 אַחֲרֵיכֵ֑ן
Ez3:5  וְאַחֲרֵיכֵ֞ן
RESEGMENTED TWO MORPHEMES TO PLACE MISPLACED YOD CONSONANT IN THE RIGHT PART IN THE DIVIDE BETWEEN PREPOSITION AND PRONOMINAL SUFFIX
zc2:13