cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Hi Karl (and Harish),
Many thanks indeed for writing, and thanks for providing such a clear example of what you would like.

This kind of enhancement has been on my mind for a while, and your proposal makes a lot of sense. I'll do some experimentation, and let you know if I hit any test cases that cause confusion. I'll label this as an enhancement, and report back as and when I have questions.

Best
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

karlkoeller commented on May 27, 2024

Thanks Chris for taking my request into account.

BTW this time Harish is not involved :-)

Best,
Karl

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

No problem :) I included Harish as he wrote to me in a separate email and
referenced this request :) I'll be back in touch about this.

On Sunday, 27 March 2016, karlkoeller [email protected] wrote:

Thanks Chris for taking my request into account.

BTW this time Harish is not involved :-)

Best,
Karl

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#44 (comment)

from latexindent.pl.

harishkumarholla commented on May 27, 2024

Dear Karl and Chris,
I didn't find a favourite button or something similar to support the
feature request in git hub. Since I didn't want to clutter the main thread,
I wrote a separate email to Chris requesting him to put priority to the
feature. :) That feature is really more wanted IMHO. Hope you guys don't
mind me nagging here :)

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Chris Hughes [email protected]
wrote:

No problem :) I included Harish as he wrote to me in a separate email and
referenced this request :) I'll be back in touch about this.

On Sunday, 27 March 2016, karlkoeller [email protected] wrote:

Thanks Chris for taking my request into account.

BTW this time Harish is not involved :-)

Best,
Karl

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
#44 (comment)

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#44 (comment)

with regards

Dr. Harish Kumar
Dept. of Physics
Pondicherry Engineering College
Puducherry 605 014

Ph: 0413 2655281-286 (Extn: 646)

Residence:
Dr. Harish Kumar

29 (New No.) I Main Cluny Road

Avvai Nagar, Lawspet
Puducherry 605 008

Ph: 0413 2253652, 9443052957

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Hi Karl,
Thanks again for raising this issue, and apologies for the delay -- I've spent the last year developing v3.0, which is released now (hoorah!) and hope to tackle your issue as one of the next priorities.

Can I just check/confirm: in situations where a multicolumn statement exists, you'd like the option to be able to group columns in alignment with it. Does the following YAML switch make sense?

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      delims: 1
      alignDoubleBackSlash: 1
      spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 2
      multicolumnGrouping: 1                     %<!---------------- new bit!

Best
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

karlkoeller commented on May 27, 2024

Il 18/03/2017 17:59, Chris Hughes ha scritto:

Hi Karl, Thanks again for raising this issue, and apologies for the delay -- I've spent the last year developing v3.0, which is released now (hoorah!) and hope to tackle your issue as one of the next priorities. Can I just check/confirm: in situations where a |multicolumn| statement exists, you'd like the option to be able to group columns in alignment with it. Does the following YAML switch make sense? |lookForAlignDelims: tabular: delims: 1 alignDoubleBackSlash: 1 spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 2 multicolumnGrouping: 1 %<!---------------- new bit! | — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#44 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARQCnbm8dWEAm0oQFSPzWNfK7ahtXGAzks5rnA13gaJpZM4H5Rev>.

Ciao Chris, nice to hear from you :-) Yes, I hope this is what I've requested! Thanks for remembering this feature request. Karl

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Hi both,
For reference, development of this feature is happening on https://github.com/cmhughes/latexindent.pl/tree/feature/multicolumnGrouping

I've made some progress, but a few issues remain. I'll post once it's ready to test at your end.
Best
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Hi @karlkoeller and @harishkumarholla ,
I believe I've got a working version on the branch: https://github.com/cmhughes/latexindent.pl/tree/feature/multicolumnGrouping and I believe it's ready for your review.

I've put a few demonstrations below, and would be very grateful indeed for your feedback! Do let me know if this sounds similar to what you were hoping for, and of course, do let me know if I've misunderstood!

Best
Chris

PS: my apologies for the delay on this one -- Version 3.0 took a long time to develop; hopefully, in the future, these types of things will take less time to resolve/implement. Thanks for your patience!

The starting point for each of the following demonstrations is the file containing Karl's original table:

\begin{table}[h]
  \caption{Muuntajan nimellisarvot ja ylajannitepuolelta mitatut arvot}
  \centering
  \begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}l}
    \toprule
    \multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
    \midrule
    $S_N$&$=$&$\SI{1000}{\kV\A}$&$U_0$&$=$&$U_{N1}$&$U_k$&$=$&$\SI{360}{\V}$\\
    $U_{N1}$&$=$&$\SI{6000}{V}$&$I_0$&$=$&$\SI{1.67}{\ampere}$&$I_k$&$=$&$I_{N1}$\\
    $U_{N2}$&$=$&$\SI{400}{\volt}$&$P_0$&$=$&$\SI{1550}{\watt}$&$P_k$&$=$&$\SI{8200}{\W}$\\
    $f_N$&$=$&$\SI{50}{\hertz}$&&\\
    \bottomrule
    \multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
    \multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
    \multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&more&text&here\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
  \end{tabular}
\end{table}

demonstration 1

Using

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      multiColumnGrouping: 1
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 1

then the following output is obtained; note that the multicolumn grouping is in effect, and also that the row that does not contain the maximum number of ampersands has been aligned.

\begin{table}[h]
	\caption{Muuntajan nimellisarvot ja ylajannitepuolelta mitatut arvot}
	\centering
	\begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}l}
		\toprule
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}   & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe} \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\midrule
		$S_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{1000}{\kV\A}$ & $U_0$ & $=$ & $U_{N1}$             & $U_k$ & $=$  & $\SI{360}{\V}$    \\
		$U_{N1}$ & $=$ & $\SI{6000}{V}$     & $I_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1.67}{\ampere}$ & $I_k$ & $=$  & $I_{N1}$          \\
		$U_{N2}$ & $=$ & $\SI{400}{\volt}$  & $P_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1550}{\watt}$   & $P_k$ & $=$  & $\SI{8200}{\W}$   \\
		$f_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{50}{\hertz}$  &       &                                                               \\
		\bottomrule
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}                                        & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe} \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}   & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe} \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}                                        & more  & text & here              \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}

demonstration 2

Using

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      alignDoubleBackSlash: 0
      spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 0
      multiColumnGrouping: 1
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 1

we obtain the following; it's the same as in demonstration 1, except \\ have not been aligned:

\begin{table}[h]
	\caption{Muuntajan nimellisarvot ja ylajannitepuolelta mitatut arvot}
	\centering
	\begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}l}
		\toprule
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}   & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\midrule
		$S_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{1000}{\kV\A}$ & $U_0$ & $=$ & $U_{N1}$             & $U_k$ & $=$  & $\SI{360}{\V}$\\
		$U_{N1}$ & $=$ & $\SI{6000}{V}$     & $I_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1.67}{\ampere}$ & $I_k$ & $=$  & $I_{N1}$\\
		$U_{N2}$ & $=$ & $\SI{400}{\volt}$  & $P_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1550}{\watt}$   & $P_k$ & $=$  & $\SI{8200}{\W}$\\
		$f_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{50}{\hertz}$  &       &\\
		\bottomrule
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}                                        & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}   & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}                                        & more  & text & here\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}

demonstration 3

Using

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      alignDoubleBackSlash: 0
      spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 3
      multiColumnGrouping: 1
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 1

the following output is obtained; it's similar to demonstration 2, except 3 spaces have been added before \\

\begin{table}[h]
	\caption{Muuntajan nimellisarvot ja ylajannitepuolelta mitatut arvot}
	\centering
	\begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}l}
		\toprule
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}   & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}   \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\midrule
		$S_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{1000}{\kV\A}$ & $U_0$ & $=$ & $U_{N1}$             & $U_k$ & $=$  & $\SI{360}{\V}$   \\
		$U_{N1}$ & $=$ & $\SI{6000}{V}$     & $I_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1.67}{\ampere}$ & $I_k$ & $=$  & $I_{N1}$   \\
		$U_{N2}$ & $=$ & $\SI{400}{\volt}$  & $P_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1550}{\watt}$   & $P_k$ & $=$  & $\SI{8200}{\W}$   \\
		$f_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{50}{\hertz}$  &       &   \\
		\bottomrule
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}                                        & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}   \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}   & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}   \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}                                        & more  & text & here   \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}

demonstration 4

Using

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      multiColumnGrouping: 0
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 1

then the output is as follows; note that the & have been aligned, even in the multicolumn rows, but that the cells have not been 'grouped' underneath the multicolumn commands:

\begin{table}[h]
	\caption{Muuntajan nimellisarvot ja ylajannitepuolelta mitatut arvot}
	\centering
	\begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}l}
		\toprule
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}                                                                      \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\midrule
		$S_N$                             & $=$                                & $\SI{1000}{\kV\A}$               & $U_0$ & $=$ & $U_{N1}$             & $U_k$ & $=$ & $\SI{360}{\V}$  \\
		$U_{N1}$                          & $=$                                & $\SI{6000}{V}$                   & $I_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1.67}{\ampere}$ & $I_k$ & $=$ & $I_{N1}$        \\
		$U_{N2}$                          & $=$                                & $\SI{400}{\volt}$                & $P_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1550}{\watt}$   & $P_k$ & $=$ & $\SI{8200}{\W}$ \\
		$f_N$                             & $=$                                & $\SI{50}{\hertz}$                &       &                                                            \\
		\bottomrule
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}                                                                                                           \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe} & \multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}                                                                      \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot} & more                               & text                             & here                                                               \\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}

demonstration 5

Using

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      multiColumnGrouping: 0
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 0

then the following output is obtained, which is pretty much 'the old way'!

\begin{table}[h]
	\caption{Muuntajan nimellisarvot ja ylajannitepuolelta mitatut arvot}
	\centering
	\begin{tabular}{r@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}lr@{\hspace{2pt}}c@{\hspace{2pt}}l}
		\toprule
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\midrule
		$S_N$    & $=$ & $\SI{1000}{\kV\A}$ & $U_0$ & $=$ & $U_{N1}$             & $U_k$ & $=$ & $\SI{360}{\V}$  \\
		$U_{N1}$ & $=$ & $\SI{6000}{V}$     & $I_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1.67}{\ampere}$ & $I_k$ & $=$ & $I_{N1}$        \\
		$U_{N2}$ & $=$ & $\SI{400}{\volt}$  & $P_0$ & $=$ & $\SI{1550}{\watt}$   & $P_k$ & $=$ & $\SI{8200}{\W}$ \\
		$f_N$&$=$&$\SI{50}{\hertz}$&&\\
		\bottomrule
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{3}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Tyhjakayntikoe}&\multicolumn{3}{l}{Oikosulkukoe}\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
		\multicolumn{6}{l}{Nimellisarvot}&more&text&here\\ % & \multicolumn{40}{1}{something}
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}

from latexindent.pl.

karlkoeller commented on May 27, 2024

You've got it, Chris!
Demonstration 1 is exactly what I asked for. Can this be put in the defaults?

Thanks again for your great work,
Karl

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Many thanks, Karl :) I've got a fair bit more testing to do, with some interesting test cases from the tex exchange. Will post back with an update, hopefully soon.

Best
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Hi Karl,
Thanks again for your feedback :)

I believe that this feature is nearly ready to go, I've put it through quite a few tests, and it seems to be working as expected.

I've got defaultSettings.yaml set up so that

      multiColumnGrouping: 0
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 1

which means that the default output would be as in demonstration 4 from the above. Each user can, of course specify multiColumnGrouping for each of the code blocks that they detail in lookForAlignDelims, for example:

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      delims: 1
      alignDoubleBackSlash: 1
      spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 2
      multiColumnGrouping: 1
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 1

Does this sound ok?

Best wishes
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

karlkoeller commented on May 27, 2024

I would prefer demonstration 1 to go into the default defaultSettings.yaml, since in my opinion it makes more sense.

But even if you don't change your mind, this is a great improvement!

Thanks, my friend
Karl

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Just to touch base, Karl: am still working on this -- I'm pulling quite a few examples from the tex exchange, some of which are highlighting different, subtle issues.

I won't be able to work on it this week, but will pick it up from next weekend. It is my top latexindent priority :)
Best
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Thanks again for this suggestion, Karl! As of #68, it is released as Version 3.2.

I have also uploaded it to ctan today (19th June, 2017).

Best wishes
Chris

from latexindent.pl.

karlkoeller commented on May 27, 2024

Great !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you very much.

Best,
Karl

from latexindent.pl.

yangmw commented on May 27, 2024

Hi @cmhughes,
Thank you for a very useful program! This is what I've been missing all these years doing Latex and that exists in most other coding languages. Your latexindex.exe works like a charm together with TeXstudio and you have excellent documentation!

However, I encountered an issue, whenever my table headings becomes longer then the table items their Ampersand aligns with huge spaces in between my table items like this:

\begin{table}[htbp]
	\centering
	\caption{Add caption}
	\begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr}
		\toprule
		\multicolumn{1}{c}{Expiry} & Tenor & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},10}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},25}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},50}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},75}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},90}$} \\
		\midrule
		                30-03-2016 &    1D &                                        -2E-14 &                                        -2E-14 &                                         3E-14 &                                        -8E-14 &                                        -7E-14 \\
		                05-04-2016 &    1W &                                        -4E-15 &                                        -1E-14 &                                         1E-14 &                                        -6E-15 &                                        -1E-14 \\
		                12-04-2016 &    2W &                                         3E-15 &                                         1E-14 &                                         1E-14 &                                        -3E-14 &                                        -2E-14 \\
		                27-04-2016 &    1M &                                        -2E-16 &                                        -2E-15 &                                        -1E-14 &                                        -7E-15 &                                        -2E-15 \\
		                27-05-2016 &    2M &                                         2E-15 &                                         7E-15 &                                         2E-15 &                                        -4E-15 &                                         4E-15 \\
		                28-06-2016 &    3M &                                        -4E-15 &                                         3E-16 &                                        -4E-15 &                                        -2E-15 &                                        -8E-15 \\
		                28-09-2016 &    6M &                                         1E-16 &                                         3E-16 &                                             0 &                                        -2E-15 &                                        -5E-15 \\
		                28-12-2016 &    9M &                                         1E-16 &                                         1E-15 &                                         2E-15 &                                         8E-15 &                                        -3E-15 \\
		                29-03-2017 &    1Y &                                         2E-16 &                                         2E-15 &                                         5E-15 &                                         1E-14 &                                         2E-14 \\
		                27-03-2018 &    2Y &                                         1E-15 &                                         7E-16 &                                        -2E-15 &                                         3E-16 &                                         5E-15 \\
		                27-03-2019 &    3Y &                                        -2E-16 &                                         1E-15 &                                        -6E-16 &                                        -2E-15 &                                        -4E-15 \\
		                27-03-2020 &    4Y &                                        -2E-16 &                                         1E-16 &                                         5E-16 &                                        -2E-16 &                                        -8E-15 \\
		                29-03-2021 &    5Y &                                         2E-16 &                                        -4E-16 &                                             0 &                                        -2E-15 &                                        -2E-15 \\
		\bottomrule
	\end{tabular}%
	\label{tab:addlabel}%
\end{table}%

The settings in the .yaml is:

lookForAlignDelims:
   tabular: 
      delims: 1
      alignDoubleBackSlash: 1
      spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 1
      multiColumnGrouping: 0
      alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 0
      spacesBeforeAmpersand: 1
      spacesAfterAmpersand: 1
      justification: "right"

Is it possible for latexindent to ignore table headings? Then it would be very nice like this:

\begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr}
	\toprule
	30-03-2016 & 1D & -2E-14 & -3E-14 &  1E-14 & -8E-14 & -1E-14 \\
	05-04-2016 & 1W & -0E-15 & -4E-14 &  2E-14 & -5E-15 & -5E-14 \\
	12-04-2016 & 2W &  9E-15 &  5E-14 &  3E-14 & -3E-14 & -6E-14 \\
	27-04-2016 & 1M & -8E-16 & -6E-15 & -4E-14 & -4E-15 & -7E-15 \\
	27-05-2016 & 2M &  7E-15 &  7E-15 &  5E-15 & -4E-15 &  8E-15 \\
	28-06-2016 & 3M & -6E-15 &  8E-16 & -6E-15 & -3E-15 & -1E-15 \\
	28-09-2016 & 6M &  5E-16 &  9E-16 &      0 & -2E-15 & -2E-15 \\
	28-12-2016 & 9M &  4E-16 &  2E-15 &  7E-15 &  8E-15 & -3E-15 \\
	29-03-2017 & 1Y &  3E-16 &  1E-15 &  8E-15 &  2E-14 &  4E-14 \\
	27-03-2018 & 2Y &  2E-15 &  4E-16 & -9E-15 &  3E-16 &  5E-15 \\
	27-03-2019 & 3Y & -1E-16 &  5E-15 & -1E-16 & -2E-15 & -6E-15 \\
	27-03-2020 & 4Y & -9E-16 &  6E-16 &  3E-16 & -2E-16 & -7E-15 \\
	29-03-2021 & 5Y &  8E-16 & -7E-16 &      0 & -2E-15 & -9E-15 \\
	\bottomrule
\end{tabular}%

Best wishes,

Yang.

from latexindent.pl.

cmhughes commented on May 27, 2024

Thanks for this, it looks interesting. Perhaps you could open a new issue, as I think it'll have to be a feature request :)

…

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020, 15:28 Yang Min Wang, ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @cmhughes <https://github.com/cmhughes> Thank you for a very useful program! This is what I've been missing all these years doing Latex and that exists in most other coding languages. Your latexindex.exe works like a charm together with TeXstudio and you have excellent documentation! However, I encountered an issue, whenever my table headings becomes longer then the table items their Ampersand aligns with huge spaces in between my table items like this: \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \caption{Add caption} \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr} \toprule \multicolumn{1}{c}{Expiry} & Tenor & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},10}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},25}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},50}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},75}$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\Delta_{\text{call},90}$} \\ \midrule 30-03-2016 & 1D & -2E-14 & -2E-14 & 3E-14 & -8E-14 & -7E-14 \\ 05-04-2016 & 1W & -4E-15 & -1E-14 & 1E-14 & -6E-15 & -1E-14 \\ 12-04-2016 & 2W & 3E-15 & 1E-14 & 1E-14 & -3E-14 & -2E-14 \\ 27-04-2016 & 1M & -2E-16 & -2E-15 & -1E-14 & -7E-15 & -2E-15 \\ 27-05-2016 & 2M & 2E-15 & 7E-15 & 2E-15 & -4E-15 & 4E-15 \\ 28-06-2016 & 3M & -4E-15 & 3E-16 & -4E-15 & -2E-15 & -8E-15 \\ 28-09-2016 & 6M & 1E-16 & 3E-16 & 0 & -2E-15 & -5E-15 \\ 28-12-2016 & 9M & 1E-16 & 1E-15 & 2E-15 & 8E-15 & -3E-15 \\ 29-03-2017 & 1Y & 2E-16 & 2E-15 & 5E-15 & 1E-14 & 2E-14 \\ 27-03-2018 & 2Y & 1E-15 & 7E-16 & -2E-15 & 3E-16 & 5E-15 \\ 27-03-2019 & 3Y & -2E-16 & 1E-15 & -6E-16 & -2E-15 & -4E-15 \\ 27-03-2020 & 4Y & -2E-16 & 1E-16 & 5E-16 & -2E-16 & -8E-15 \\ 29-03-2021 & 5Y & 2E-16 & -4E-16 & 0 & -2E-15 & -2E-15 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular}% \label{tab:addlabel}% \end{table}% The settings in the .yaml is: lookForAlignDelims: tabular: delims: 1 alignDoubleBackSlash: 1 spacesBeforeDoubleBackSlash: 1 multiColumnGrouping: 0 alignRowsWithoutMaxDelims: 0 spacesBeforeAmpersand: 1 spacesAfterAmpersand: 1 justification: "right" Is it possible for latexindent to ignore table headings? Then it would world very nice like this: \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr} \toprule 30-03-2016 & 1D & -2E-14 & -3E-14 & 1E-14 & -8E-14 & -1E-14 \\ 05-04-2016 & 1W & -0E-15 & -4E-14 & 2E-14 & -5E-15 & -5E-14 \\ 12-04-2016 & 2W & 9E-15 & 5E-14 & 3E-14 & -3E-14 & -6E-14 \\ 27-04-2016 & 1M & -8E-16 & -6E-15 & -4E-14 & -4E-15 & -7E-15 \\ 27-05-2016 & 2M & 7E-15 & 7E-15 & 5E-15 & -4E-15 & 8E-15 \\ 28-06-2016 & 3M & -6E-15 & 8E-16 & -6E-15 & -3E-15 & -1E-15 \\ 28-09-2016 & 6M & 5E-16 & 9E-16 & 0 & -2E-15 & -2E-15 \\ 28-12-2016 & 9M & 4E-16 & 2E-15 & 7E-15 & 8E-15 & -3E-15 \\ 29-03-2017 & 1Y & 3E-16 & 1E-15 & 8E-15 & 2E-14 & 4E-14 \\ 27-03-2018 & 2Y & 2E-15 & 4E-16 & -9E-15 & 3E-16 & 5E-15 \\ 27-03-2019 & 3Y & -1E-16 & 5E-15 & -1E-16 & -2E-15 & -6E-15 \\ 27-03-2020 & 4Y & -9E-16 & 6E-16 & 3E-16 & -2E-16 & -7E-15 \\ 29-03-2021 & 5Y & 8E-16 & -7E-16 & 0 & -2E-15 & -9E-15 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular}% — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#44?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAQ7CYDOVCGZR4P42Y5Y47LQ54TQPA5CNFSM4B7FC6X2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJAWNWQ#issuecomment-574711514>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQ7CYBFBDOYEVQSF7LKRPDQ54TQPANCNFSM4B7FC6XQ> .

from latexindent.pl.

better formatting for tables about latexindent.pl HOT 17 CLOSED

Comments (17)

with regards

Ph: 0413 2655281-286 (Extn: 646)

29 (New No.) I Main Cluny Road

Ph: 0413 2253652, 9443052957

demonstration 1

demonstration 2

demonstration 3

demonstration 4

demonstration 5

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

React

Vue.js

Typescript

TensorFlow

Django

Laravel

D3

Recommend Topics

javascript

web

server

Machine learning

Visualization

Game

Recommend Org

Facebook

Microsoft

Google

Alibaba

D3

Tencent