Move away from travisCI

[SimonBaeumer]

Move away from travisCI

[fbartels]

Did you mean to write "travis"?

[dylanhitt]

Mind changing the title as well? 😄

Yeah, I say we give github actions a shot. I already made #143. Maybe we want to try both?

[SimonBaeumer]

Did you mean to write "travis"?

Thank you! Yes I meant travis, corrected it.

[SimonBaeumer]

Opsi, sorry about that, changed the title 👍
Then let us give github actions a try first. I would only try both if we are not satisfied with github actions.

[dylanhitt]

Just to clarify, #143 is about creating a github action for a commander release. Essentially tailoring an action made to just run commander test/add (and maybe a few other things since at the end of the day it will just be a container image).

The action will need to be placed in a separate repo (possibly 2 repos as docker actions don't support windows and I'm not sure about the logic behind selecting windows v. linux in composite actions yet. But I'm pretty sure it will take 2 actions as composite actions require you to specify the shell). We could use the action for the commander integration test suite, possibly. As we can allow users to pass in their desired commander version to our action.

As you stated this issue is about moving commander-cli/commander's CI to github actions 😄. Sorry for the spam didn't want to mislead with my comment above.