Question: flatpak vs normal wine / performance

[lord-x-type]

Question: flatpak vs normal wine / performance

[lord-x-type]

Ok, thanks for your advice!
I will try installing cuda.:)
Not at home for the next two weeks, but following your work with high interess!
At the last try..i had probs using the flatpak installer..it gave me a checksumm error every time on installing mono..strange...starting fusion was not possible too.
But i think the problem is on my side.

Glad to see your code grow nearly every day :)

Thanks.
When i arrive at home ill do some more testing and error reporting, if i will find something.

See you :)

[cryinkfly]

Ok, when you work with Autodesk Fusion 360 in wine, then it’s normally that it takes so long to start at the moment, but when it opened, then I can work without any performance problems.

If you have installed the newest graphics driver?

When the answer is 👍, then it can be a good idea for you to install also the Nvidia-CUDA-Toolkit on your system and the performance again!

Here you get more information: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-downloads?target_os=Linux&target_arch=x86_64

On my system I have installed this. 😊

Would it run better in flatpak?
Or what would be the benefit oft flatpak vs pure wine?

At the moment I can’t tell you, if this run better with Flatpak, but I think this way solve many problems with the different Linux distribution and so it’s not do important which packages are installed or not.

Thanks so much for your good work!

You are welcome! 🤗

[cryinkfly]

At the last try..i had probs using the flatpak installer..it gave me a checksumm error every time on installing mono..strange...starting fusion was not possible too.
But i think the problem is on my side.

I had never had this problem before. 😅

But if the problem persists with the checksum later, then we can this solve together. 👌

When i arrive at home ill do some more testing and error reporting, if i will find something.

That's a good idea. 👌

See you later too. 😊