Comments (6)
Hello @Mirorrn, that is a good question, but difficult to answer. The author provides his pre-trained models via a download link form his dropbox. It could be he re-trained or tuned hyperparameters after his post, without making new commits to the repository. I used his pre-trained models and as far as I remember I evaluated them in his code-base (but made sure, embedded in his code, my own models perform the same as in my own evaluation pipeline). I will have a quick look into that again.
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.
Ok, I checked it again. The difference between my evaluation and the original sgan evaluation should be, that I also consider partial trajectories of the target pedestrian i. Lets say pedestrian i is visible in the scene from timestep t0 to tn, then I also considered him/her when this observation period is not a full sequence (20 timesteps). In the social gan they would have skipped this pedestrian. Hope that helps!
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.
Ok, thank you for this quick response. This of course explains why the result is so much better. Because the first time steps are relatively easy to predict. It would have been good to see this directly in the paper, since SGAN, for example, only evaluates the predictions that are 20 time steps long in total.
Thank you for your work and confirmation that the data set is not sufficient. I also find it interesting that so far no paper addresses the collisions in the predictions. Most architectures are based on LSTM which produce independent results during the prediction, which is a guarantee for collisions.
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.
Yes, in particular the maximum FDE is smaller when a short trajectory is predicted. This benefitted all models.
I agree, but even in the interaction-aware models collisions seem to happen, which agrees with my conclusions that interaction-aware behavior is not learend. Did you see the issue about collisions in the sgan repo? A student showed clearly that no collision avoidance is happening in sgan. But in general, my hypothesis is that people move rather chaotic and no relevant statistical patterns can be extracted to model interaction-awareness.
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.
Not only the FDE but the ADE too i have tested it with my code!
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.
Thats reasonable too, because with shorter prediction horizons the spread between predicted and true trajectory is smaller for all timesteps.
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.
Related Issues (5)
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from constant_velocity_pedestrian_motion.