get_random_answers isn't particularly useful

[csu]

get_random_answers isn't particularly useful

[rohithpr]

In case someone wants a bunch of answers for data science projects or something, they could make use of it rather than having to specify a value manually. Ofc this could be done by the users themselves... Doesn't hurt to have an extra function right? 😄

[csu]

It actually does kind of hurt to include it. If they want to use get_one_answer like this, they can write get_random_answerrs themselves, but we won't decide that for them. Libraries should be more general than that.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Rohith PR [email protected]
wrote:

In case someone wants a bunch of answers for data science projects or something, they could make use of it rather than having to specify a value manually. Ofc this could be done by the users themselves... Doesn't hurt to have an extra function right? 😄

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#62 (comment)

[rohithpr]

Um, oka! :p

On 07/01/2015, Christopher Su [email protected] wrote:

It actually does kind of hurt to include it. If they want to use
get_one_answer like this, they can write get_random_answerrs themselves, but
we won't decide that for them. Libraries should be more general than that.

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Rohith PR [email protected]
wrote:

In case someone wants a bunch of answers for data science projects or
something, they could make use of it rather than having to specify a value
manually. Ofc this could be done by the users themselves... Doesn't hurt

to have an extra function right? 😄

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#62 (comment)

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#62 (comment)