More explanation for links

[ctjhoa]

More explanation for links

[ctjhoa]

Thank you very much for the link @brson ! It's very valuable for my small project.

For this issue, I'm not against adding some explanations on links, but there is some issues.

First, most of links doesn't have this short description so I have to write it myself and some author may not like it (I've already faced issue for a wrong title. See #15 ). Plus, as English is not my mother tongue, I'm not sure to be able to write the perfect description on each link.

Second, as you mentioned it "the list grow". If I add a description on each link, a single file won't be sufficient anymore and I will need to split each section in separate file. Looking for a specific subject might also be more difficult because file will be less readable.

Finally I'm not sure that explanations will be so helpful since we already got the title of the article and the section's name to determine the subject.

Tell me what you think. If anyone wants to share his thoughts on this issue I take it.

[Ethkuil]

There are many materials and which ones are "better" usually depends on the reader themself.

For example, I have learned C++ (so some introduction can be simplified and comparison with C++ is welcomed), I prefer there is a small project with most important basic features of Rust but except that I I prefer learning from definitions instead of by examples.

However, certainly there are learners with different knowledge basis and different prefers.

It would be much more perfect if these info, the style of the materials, could be added. Even if not all materials are covered. What's more, readers can new a PR to describe some material after they have experienced it.