Comments (18)
//cc @django/djangoproject-com-maintainters
from dsf-working-groups.
...do you think this existing group should be converted into a working group, or do something else?
I would ask those folks if they'd like to join the initial wave, and then convert it yes.
Given it's very nearly the solstice, I need to take an amnesty and step back from involvement. (It's been a bit of a year.) Happy if folks want an opinion on a specific query, but I don't have the capacity to help steer the site forward right now. 💝 (Update: I removed myself from the team. ✅)
from dsf-working-groups.
I would love to be part of it!
from dsf-working-groups.
@carltongibson oh thanks for the pointer to that group. One easy option here would be to start by the WG's membership being that group and then grow from there.
from dsf-working-groups.
I have created a PR #10 for the website working group. Can l ask members to review it and give some sort of approval if you agree. The initial members are: @sabderemane, @easherma-truth , @marksweb , @jcjudkins, @pauloxnet, @CuriousLearner, @tobiasmcnulty & me. If l have left anyone my apologies just indicate and l will add you.
Outstanding items:
- Where to post comms (Slack/ mailing list)
- Where can users join the group (currently mailing list)
- Selecting Chair & Co-chair
From the guide it is highlighted that everything doesn't have to be completed at this point but @thibaudcolas who is willing to take this to the board on their next meeting which is on the 8th of February 2024 suggested that we should have everything in place if possible.
from dsf-working-groups.
I’m not sure who can see the list of members at @django/djangoproject-com-maintainters, so for context this is 9 people:
Username | Name |
---|---|
@nessita | nessita |
@camilonova | Camilo Nova |
@pauloxnet | Paolo Melchiorre |
@cgl | Çağıl Uluşahin |
@felixxm | Mariusz Felisiak |
@CuriousLearner | Sanyam Khurana |
@ronnzw | Ron Maravanyika |
@sabderemane | Sarah Abderemane |
@logankilpatrick | Logan Kilpatrick |
@carltongibson @nessita @camilonova @pauloxnet @cgl @felixxm @CuriousLearner @ronnzw @sabderemane @logankilpatrick what do you think? re the comments from @jacobian, @pauloxnet, @marksweb – do you think this existing group should be converted into a working group, or do something else?
I don’t seem to have access to enough of the site’s admin to check who else might be managing the site to cc into this discussion – could someone else do that?
from dsf-working-groups.
from dsf-working-groups.
from dsf-working-groups.
Happy new year everyone! If I understand the steps correctly, we have plenty enough people interested in this. Now we need to write a proposal, including a draft charter as @jacobian mentioned.
Who’s up for doing this?
See #6 as a recent example. If anyone is keen to write the proposal and does so soon enough, then we have two board members who have expressed interest (me and @sabderemane), who can take it to the DSF board for review at the next board meeting on Thursday next week.
Separately, I’ve asked the ops team who publishes articles on the site, and have been told this isn’t normally part of their remit. It’s just a last resort.
I'm happy to run with this @thibaudcolas & @jacobian.
from dsf-working-groups.
@jacobian I think that's likely the way forwards, evolve the current group to the new WG format.
I suspect this will get some more traction next week after those who've been in Durham get home.
from dsf-working-groups.
I’d be interested!
from dsf-working-groups.
I am interested in helping!
from dsf-working-groups.
How do you think we can move forward with this proposal for the website working group?
from dsf-working-groups.
@pauloxnet I'm not sure who makes up the current group that maintains or has responsibility for the website, but I think input from them is key to progression - though I think you're part of that group?
I'm happy to be involved, though I don't have to be if the current group are happy to just taken on this more formal state of a working group. I mostly raised this as a means to get the process moving after a discussion on mastodon that this would be a good group to form.
I think once there's an idea of who might be involved, I think a draft charter could then be started.
from dsf-working-groups.
I’ve asked around and have been told @django/ops-team currently manages blog additions on behalf of people who don’t have direct access to the site. With that in mind, @tobiasmcnulty @timgraham @MarkusH @felixxm, what are your thoughts on whether / how to do those content management duties in the working group model? Would you retain this role, or hand it over to a working group, or share it?
from dsf-working-groups.
do you think this existing group should be converted into a working group, or do something else?
Sounds good. I would like to be a part of this working group.
from dsf-working-groups.
Happy new year everyone! If I understand the steps correctly, we have plenty enough people interested in this. Now we need to write a proposal, including a draft charter as @jacobian mentioned.
Who’s up for doing this?
See #6 as a recent example. If anyone is keen to write the proposal and does so soon enough, then we have two board members who have expressed interest (me and @sabderemane), who can take it to the DSF board for review at the next board meeting on Thursday next week.
Separately, I’ve asked the ops team who publishes articles on the site, and have been told this isn’t normally part of their remit. It’s just a last resort.
from dsf-working-groups.
@ronnzw go team! 🙌 From private discussions, @cgl is keen to be your Board Liaison, and @sabderemane and I to join as members.
I think you might be referring to this from the guide:
Don't worry about getting it all in the first pass; you're welcome to leave some fields as "todo", and come back and edit the PR later to add that info.
This just means it’s fine for your first drafts to have information missing. What I say is that the proposal has to be complete (unless there’s a good reason not to I suppose) for the board to review. See under decision-making:
After your proposal is complete, notify the board, via your board liaison, that it's ready to be reviewed.
from dsf-working-groups.
Related Issues (6)
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from dsf-working-groups.