Licensing issues

[douglascrockford]

Licensing issues

[douglascrockford]

No. If the license is not acceptable to you, then you must not use the software.

By the way, "evil" is not a "specific field of endeavor".

[mistic100]

I've nothing to do with the meaning of this sentence.
The point is I don't understand you : you make a good software and wreck yourself with a corrupted license, that's against ethics OSI tries to establish...

[douglascrockford]

How can you say that a principled stand against evil is unethical? You aren't making sense.

[mistic100]

As I said I don't point out the sence of this sentence, I totally respect your point of view about good and evil.
But this is absolutely not the question, for me the problem is only you modify the license text, without any other consideration than by doing this you actually not distribute your work under the MIT license, the law is clear on this point.

Just move the sentence outside the license text (for example at the very end of the commented section) and I will be fine for me, and I suppose for Debian team too.

[douglascrockford]

Tell Debian to stop promoting evil.