Can't work properly

[elin-croft]

Can't work properly

[elin-croft]

Thank you so much! Those two repos worked :D

…

On Oct 20, 2021, at 10:28 PM, Derek Sifford ***@***.***> wrote: The cpp syntax in nvim-treesitter is top-notch as well. But that requires neovim. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#265 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGIUR2VXVLUGMCPIW7MJVVLUH3GYRANCNFSM5GGPUP7Q>.

[benknoble]

Question: is your terminal's font italic?

Anyway, see #242 and #219; if they don't answer your question, let us know and we'll re-open this. (The idea is that types should be italic blue, but if the terminal info read via TERM doesn't support italic properly it may show up inverted.)

[elin-croft]

Thanks, your solution in #219 really worked! But there is still a problem with highlighting key words key words like string and vector in cpp and functions won’t be highlighted. Dracula in vim and vscode

…

On Oct 18, 2021, at 10:07 PM, D. Ben Knoble ***@***.***> wrote: Question: is your terminal's font italic? Anyway, see #242 <#242> and #219 <#219>; if they don't answer your question, let us know and we'll re-open this. (The idea is that types should be italic blue, but if the terminal info read via TERM doesn't support italic properly it may show up inverted.) — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#265 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGIUR2RWQUQMLQXLRGSUTF3UHQS3JANCNFSM5GGPUP7Q>.

[benknoble]

Perhaps you could post some code: I'll see what my vim gives with the stock cpp syntax. If that's not enough you may just need a better syntax file, or we may need to add to our highlights.

[elin-croft]

``` #include<iostream> #include<vector> #include<queue> using namespace std; vector<int> topSort(vector<vector<int>>&graph, vector<int>deg, int n){ vector<int>res; queue<int>que; for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i){ if(deg[i] == 0){ que.push(i); } } if(que.size() > 1){ return {}; } while(!que.empty()){ auto cur = que.front(); que.pop(); res.push_back(cur); for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i){ if(graph[cur][i] == 1){ --deg[i]; if(deg[i] == 0){ que.push(i); } } } if(que.size() > 1){ return {}; } } return res; } Int main(){ return 0; } ```

…

On Oct 19, 2021, at 8:04 PM, D. Ben Knoble ***@***.***> wrote: Perhaps you could post some code: I'll see what my vim gives with the stock cpp syntax. If that's not enough you may just need a better syntax file, or we may need to add to our highlights. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#265 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGIUR2XO5V6WHAQ3WJSCTDTUHVNEXANCNFSM5GGPUP7Q>.

[benknoble]

Huh, for some reason I can't get that formatted right. (emails don't support markdown) But I will try to get the screenshot I mentioned.

[benknoble]

Here's what I get. Looks fine to me. The green highlighting is from something I stole:

" ~/.vim/after/syntax/c.vim
" https://vi.stackexchange.com/q/4975/10604
syntax match cFunction "\<[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*\>[^()]*)("me=e-2
syntax match cFunction "\<[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z_0-9]*\>s*("me=e-1
highlight link cFunction Function

I should probably actually simplify those patterns…

[benknoble]

If you want more, googling vim cpp syntax comes up with at least two possibilities:

• https://github.com/octol/vim-cpp-enhanced-highlight
• https://github.com/bfrg/vim-cpp-modern

I can't comment on how good either is

[dsifford]

The cpp syntax in nvim-treesitter is top-notch as well. But that requires neovim.