Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

Comments (8)

lfshr avatar lfshr commented on June 3, 2024

I've recently stumbled upon this problem while working with DSC. @kwirkykat I'm happy to do the work. Do you think this should be in it's own resource with a single "Ensure" variable, or could this go into xDhcpServerAuthorization (I already have the code written in there but I can split it out).

from xdhcpserver.

kenvb avatar kenvb commented on June 3, 2024

I agree, this is a necessary addition to make the resource really "no touch"

from xdhcpserver.

kwirkykat avatar kwirkykat commented on June 3, 2024

@LiamFisher92 Is there any instance outside xDhcpServerAuthorization where it would be useful to be able to create the DHCP Administrators and the DHCP Users groups?
My first guess is 'probably'.
If yes or maybe, it should be its own resource. If no, it can just be a part of xDhcpServerAuthorization via a parameter

from xdhcpserver.

lfshr avatar lfshr commented on June 3, 2024

@kwirkykat I can't think of a reason you would need the security groups without authorizing the DHCP server. Would splitting them out not lead to potential fully set-up unauthorized DHCP servers floating around? I'd be happy to shift them around if somebody else can think of one? I'm conscious of the fact I might lose the code I've already done so I'll submit a PR for now.

from xdhcpserver.

kwirkykat avatar kwirkykat commented on June 3, 2024

@LiamFisher92 Ok. If there is no reason to split it out, then the security group creation should stay in xDhcpServerAuthorization

from xdhcpserver.

lfshr avatar lfshr commented on June 3, 2024

@kwirkykat I'm not really a DHCP expert (I'm a games development graduate in disguise) so I can't really give you a definitive answer. Do you know anyone who could?

from xdhcpserver.

kwirkykat avatar kwirkykat commented on June 3, 2024

@LiamFisher92 I'll ask around

from xdhcpserver.

johlju avatar johlju commented on June 3, 2024

I think this should be a separate resource - having the DHCP server authorized (Ensure -eq 'Present') or not authorized (Ensure -eq 'Absent'), is not the same as having local security groups present or absent (not sure it's easy to remove them iether once created?).

I suggest a new resource DhcpLocalSecurityGroups is created. The existing PR #33 could might be changed for this.

from xdhcpserver.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.