Change hosts file format

[dukexar]

Change hosts file format

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I agree that this would be a better format, but to start with, we'll need to 
support 
both syntaxes (before deprecating the old syntax).  This isn't a really high 
priority 
issue, but I agree that it would be an improvement.  I'll get to it eventually, 
but it 
will probably be in PSSH 2.2 rather than PSSH 2.1.

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Feb 2010 at 5:47

• Changed state: Accepted
• Added labels: Priority-Low
• Removed labels: Priority-Medium

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I've implemented the [user@]host[:port] in a new commit (which is _not_ 
included in 
PSSH 2.1).  Anyway, feel free to give it a try and see what you think.

Eventually, we'll need to deprecate the old line format, too, but for now the 
new line 
format should work.  Let me know if you have any problems.

Original comment by [email protected] on 25 Feb 2010 at 6:00

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Since I haven't heard back from you, I'm going to close this issue.  However, it
would still be great if you could test it and give feedback.  Thanks.

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Mar 2010 at 3:55

• Changed state: Fixed

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sorry.. seems I missed your comment 2 :)

I tested it : it works perfectly with no problem.

I tested both new and old hosts file format, and also check the output file 
names.

All is OK.. Thanks a lot.

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Mar 2010 at 9:33

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Great.  I'm glad it works.  Starting in PSSH 2.2, [user@]host[:port] will be 
the 
documented syntax for the file, and we'll probably wait a few versions to 
deprecate 
the old syntax.  Thanks for your help.

Original comment by [email protected] on 5 Mar 2010 at 5:13

• Changed state: Verified

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Where is the commit mentioned for this? I seem to have missed it. 

Original comment by [email protected] on 30 Nov 2010 at 3:56

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This is in commit bda32356.

Original comment by [email protected] on 2 Dec 2010 at 6:42