Is this pip package was ever working?

[eigenbahn]

Is this pip package was ever working?

[p3r7]

Yes, this used to work but stopped due to regular API changes, see #29.

As far as I know, pypi packages don’t run under conda. So if you want to use conda you’d have to git clone the repo.

If you’ve got some programming chops, we welcome contributions on adapting to the newest API. The timing might not be ideal, though, given the ongoing war around content moderation. The API is likely to change (again) as things settle down.

[MerlinTheProgramist]

So with the gql package import, it is some other problem, independent of that I'm trying to run it with conda? And it will be kind of hard to fix it myself?

[p3r7]

So with the gql package import, it is some other problem, independent of that I'm trying to run it with conda?

Yes.

The error message you get is due to breaking changes that were made to the gql package. f311141 fixes it but we didn't publish a new release on PyPI as there are other things to fix to make it work (the idea being to not publish a non-working version).

Namely, the play.aidungeon.io API changed and we need to adapt to these changes.

This the error you should be getting when running from git cloned sources (instead of pip installed).

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./ai_dungeon_cli/__init__.py", line 393, in <module>
    main()
  File "./ai_dungeon_cli/__init__.py", line 356, in main
    ai_dungeon.make_user_choose_config()
  File "./ai_dungeon_cli/__init__.py", line 177, in make_user_choose_config
    prompt, settings = self.api.get_options(self.api.single_player_mode_id)
  File "/home/eigen/Documents/Code/local/ai-dungeon-cli/ai_dungeon_cli/impl/api/client.py", line 124, in get_options
    prompt = result['content']['prompt']
KeyError: 'content' 

And it will be kind of hard to fix it myself?

It's not that hard. It consists of running AI Dungeon in a web browser, inspect the exchanges in developper mode and reproduce the exchanges in impl/api/client.py.

This comment is an example of the process: #23 (comment)