Indentation of Multi-Line UFCS-Chains

[emacs-d-mode-maintainers]

Indentation of Multi-Line UFCS-Chains

[russel]

Everything is possible in Emacs, the question is whether anyone has the patience to write the E-Lisp to do it. Is this alignment something people in C++ are going to start to want? It may certainly become a demand for Java mode now (with Java 8) if it hasn't already. Currently Java just uses continuation indent here as D and C++ do. Mayhap just relent and use:

  foreach (file; dirPath
           .expandTilde()
           .buildNormalizedPath()
           .dirEntries(SpanMode.shallow)()
           .filter!(name => name.extension == ".csv")) { // I love D :)
  }

[nordlow]

I just got an answer and here

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25797945/adjusting-alignment-rules-for-ucfs-chains-in-d/25843155#25843155

My first try didn't have any effect unfortunately. I'll try some more in Vanilla Emacs later on. Maybe you could try it out?

Correction: It works only with function calls with parens.

Update: The latest update works flawlessly in my Emacs!

[russel]

So I guess we add the function to the d-mode.el but leave people to use it via a d-mode-hook if they wish to?

I have prepared the ground by adding the code from the StackOverflow page in my clone of the repository. I can push the changes and the you can send in a pull request for the necessary changes to make things work?

[nordlow]

Sounds like a good plan.

Here's what I use:

https://github.com/nordlow/elisp/blob/master/mine/dotemacs.el#L1581

[russel]

I committed code and pushed to the mainline repository before reading the above. Apologies for that. Could I get you to do a diff of what you know works against what we now have in mainline and create a pull request?

[snosov1]

You have a typo in the comment above the function - it adds c-lineup... instead of d-lineup... function to the list.

[russel]

Sergei, thanks for spotting that. I had just cut and paste from the StackOverflow page, so I'll blame StackOverflow rather than me not checking things properly :-) It will be corrected momentarily.

[snosov1]

Great! Thanks!

Also, as a side note. I really think that this kind of stuff (i.e. available options and customization) should be put to the readme file and not to the source code alone. Because I doubt that a lot of people dig through the source looking for documentation.

So maybe it makes sense to move the appropriate comments from the heading of the d-mode.el file and info about this hack (and possibly other useful info) to readme to give it more publicity.

[russel]

Not so much a side note, more "I should have done that in the first place!" :-) I'll transfer more material onto the README.md file and/or take pull requests.

[russel]

I believe this issue was addressed in changesets f487a71 , 86930c3 and f4176c0 so I am closing this issue. Please re-open if there is still and issue to be addressed.