UI Improvements for main ERG workflow

[esri]

UI Improvements for main ERG workflow

[adgiles]

Implemented the settings only being shown when needed:

Default:

Table 3:

BLEVE:

[Dbarnes1]

This implementation wouldn't impact how we have our doc written btw

[adgiles]

We have been down this route with other widgets @elinz doesn't like things appearing / disappering

[Dbarnes1]

@adgiles I know we talked about it for GRG, but ERG currently has one main pane with a lot of stuff going on. I'm going to confer with some folks on the UI/UX team to see what best practices are.

[Dbarnes1]

I think that we should go this route.

[joebayles]

Agreed.
The Fire distances are intended to replace the initial isolation distances for a large spill if it's on fire, not be rendered in addition to the standard isolation distance. So...

• Only show a toggle that just says "Fire" when spill size is switched to large

The BLEVE, as far as I can ascertain, does not require a downwind protective action zone, just mandatory evacuation (wonder why... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM0jtD_OWLU... and that's a small one). Actually, it says 800m downrange for a large spill, but if it's on fire or threatening to BLEVE, the isolation distance is double that.

• Only show BLEVE toggle for the seven BLEVE materials, and...
• Only show the container size drop down when BLEVE toggle is activated.

[adgiles]

I tried that workflow but it doesn't seem to make sense, as the fire protection zone (orange guide) in cases is larger than the downwind figures. To calculate the down wind you need to create the II and PA zone. I think we should leave it drawing both and let the user determine which zone they want to use.

[Dbarnes1]

verified, I'm going to close out. I may open up other UI enhancement issues pending feedback from others across the company, but those can most likely be set to after next.