Output response

[eykrehbein]

Output response

[eykrehbein]

I'd prefer to use the existing Value keyword instead of Json but overall it's a good idea

[jgroom33]

Alternative implementation:
Assuming file output from #55

requests:
  file1_test1:
    url: https://postman-echo.com/get
    method: GET
    data:
      params:
        foo: bar
    log:
      file: true

requests:
  file2:
    url: https://postman-echo.com/get
    method: GET
    data:
      params:
        foo: Json(file1_test1.args.foo)

[shrikster]

I am having the same thoughts..
Why not just doing all the requests in one file ..
maybe we can chain them when running the tests.yaml files in a folder test ..

[jgroom33]

As the number of requests approaches 50+ it makes sense to organize them with files and directories. (Postman uses collections and folders)
The ability to specify a directory for execution is a great feature. It allows this:
1-foo_dir

• 1-foo_file.strest.yml
• 2-foo_file.strest.yml

2-foo_dir

• 2-bar_file.strest.yml
  etc

Assuming that directory 1 contains a login request, it would be good to use that param in future requests.

I think I prefer the second implemention: Json() instead of putting an env var.

[jgroom33]

agreed. Even if it is valuable to output responses to file, the better implementation for variable handling across files is to use Value()