too much tools, features; complexity

[fulls1z3]

too much tools, features; complexity

[fulls1z3]

@rdsedmundo thanks for your kind works, and your thoughts. I believe that this discussion will contribute much to the successful development and maintenance of this project. So, let's start with the points you discussed:

• Why Gulp, couldn't use just NPM as the build tool?

I was developing software using Angular much time ago, by using Gulp as a task runner in alignment with Visual Studio 2015. This project inherited much from these previous projects (reused the functionality instead of creating from scratch). Although there're some features that NPM couldn't fully cover as Gulp does, it sounds like a great idea switching to NPM.

• Why JSHint - it's because we have JS files, I guess - but, if the Angular app itself is entirely in Typescript, why the Node scripts couldn't be too, using ts-node?

A well-coded app needs to follow very strict guidelines, code styles. The main code style enforcer is obviously TsLint. However, JSHint was really necessary to enforce a consistent code style across the JS parts of this project.

Another brilliant idea is to convert Node scripts into TypeScript and voila: no need to JSHint!

• Why PostCSS, Stylelint?

PostCSS - for AutoPrefixer; Stylelint - enforcing code style (I'm aware of those rules need further improvements),

• Why having a 'lean Angular' option, if the name of the repository is Universal - couldn't this be in a separate repository?

There's actually a separate repository called ng-seed/spa which has the only lean Angular option. However, the lean Angular on this universal project saves a lot of time during development (reduced build times, HMR, etc).

• Why this big demo project using 10 different modules at the app.module, internationalization, and a lot of components? Couldn't it be a simple Hello World, maybe with two simple routes? How I'll know if I remove everything it will still work - what is mandatory and what is not?

The main reason that this project has all those dependencies, is the fact that apart being a seed project for Angular Universal, it also showcases all included modules in alignment with each other.

On the other hand, I could briefly say that almost all dependencies with ngx- prefix can be safely removed from app.module, and app.browser.module. However, this should be documented well so people wouldn't worry about what could be possible side-effects of removing those dependencies.

---

Please feel free to share your thoughts further, because I believe that these ideas would lead to great contributions to this project and also will make things easier for people who use it. Also, feel free to make PR's (documentation, functionality, etc).

[fulls1z3]

@theomathieubhvr I'd like to consult you about these topics too, so it would be really cool if you could enumerate here your thoughts on these topics.