Is it possible to filter contracts by manager or player?

[futapi]

Is it possible to filter contracts by manager or player?

[Noxdzine]

Hi, you can use a assetId and rareflag to filter ;)

[ar23]

Hi Noxdzine,

thanks for your response.
I already thought about assetId, but i wasn't able to get an ID for an item. It has always been set to 0. So I have to search for the error in my code.
for just printing the whole item information something like this should work find, shouldn't it?

items = fut.searchAuctions (criteria in here)

for item in items:
trade_id = item['tradeId']
....

print (fut.items)

Just curious about the variables and their declaration.... :S

I'm currently sitting behind a proxy so i cannot test that easy - will do later on.

thanks again :)

[ar23]

isn't it the resource-id?

[oczkers]

assetId / baseId / maskedDefId == baseId(resource_id)

[ar23]

thx oczkers.

so shouldnt I be able to just add an entry for asset-id='1234567' to the fut.searchAuctions query to just get maybe manager contracts (if the resource id from the manager contracts would be 1234567?

Or am I wrong?

Just wanted to maybe buy only manager contracts from a price range from 150 to 250. but I'm stucking like hell...

[oczkers]

sure, just provide ctype and assetId to get only specific cards

[ar23]

hm...just gives me []

my code - simplified

items = fut.searchAuctions('development', assetId=1615613739, page_size=50)

for item in items:
trade_id = item['tradeId']
buy_now_price = item['buyNowPrice']
trade_state = item['tradeState']
bid_state = item['bidState']
starting_bid = item['startingBid']
item_id = item['id']
timestamp = item['timestamp'] # auction start
rating = item['rating']
asset_id = item['assetId']
resource_id = item['resourceId']
item_state = item['itemState']
rareflag = item['rareflag']
formation = item['formation']
injury_type = item['injuryType']
suspension = item['suspension']
contract = item['contract']
playStyle = item['playStyle'] # used only for players
discardValue = item['discardValue']
itemType = item['itemType']
owners = item['owners']
offers = item['offers']
current_bid = item['currentBid']
expires = item['expires'] # seconds left

print items

as mentioned i got those ids from the resource-id fields....

[ar23]

any idea why this doesnt give me an output? cant find an error. :(((

[oczkers]

maybe there is no opened auctions?

[mvillarejo]

Hello,

using debug I compared my request with the actual request done from the
webapp... and the only difference was the order of the params... I haven't
tried yet because it seems 'not the reason' but oko do you think that's
relevant in search query?

Regards

On 12 February 2014 12:56, Piotr Staroszczyk [email protected]:

maybe there is no opened auctions?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/43#issuecomment-34861975
.

Manuel Villarejo
e: [email protected] [email protected]

AVISO LEGAL
Este mensaje va dirigido exclusivamente a su destinatario y es
confidencial. Si por error lo recibe, por favor, comuníquelo por esta vía y
elimínelo. Cualquier uso de este mensaje o sus anexos sin autorización está
prohibida por ley.

LEGAL NOTICE
This message is intended to be read exclusively by the addressee and is
confidential. Should you receive it by error, please contact the sender by
email and delete it. Any use of this message or its attachments without due
authorisation is prohibited by law.

[oczkers]

proper question is: do every browser send parameters in proper order and is it good idea to detect bots/etc based on this issue?
If they're checking parameters order we should get identical error on every request, so in my opinion it's irrelevant.

@ar23 if you're getting empty response without error it's 99% sure that there is just no open auction.

[mvillarejo]

proper answer is: I do not know that from every browser but using the same
call I get auctions from web app and I do not get any from our API.

thanks

On 12 February 2014 15:36, Piotr Staroszczyk [email protected]:

proper question is: do every browser send parameters in proper order and
is it good idea to detect bots/etc based on this issue?
If they're checking parameters order we should get identical error on
every request, so in my opinion it's irrelevant.

@ar23 https://github.com/ar23 if you're getting empty response without
error it's 99% sure that there is just no open auction.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/43#issuecomment-34874008
.

Manuel Villarejo
e: [email protected] [email protected]

AVISO LEGAL
Este mensaje va dirigido exclusivamente a su destinatario y es
confidencial. Si por error lo recibe, por favor, comuníquelo por esta vía y
elimínelo. Cualquier uso de este mensaje o sus anexos sin autorización está
prohibida por ley.

LEGAL NOTICE
This message is intended to be read exclusively by the addressee and is
confidential. Should you receive it by error, please contact the sender by
email and delete it. Any use of this message or its attachments without due
authorisation is prohibited by law.

[ar23]

no opened auction is very unlikely, the provided id should be the asset-Id of rare gold manager contracts. but maybe I did something wrong when extracting some assed IDs...

[oczkers]

@ar23 like i said previously:
assetId / baseId / maskedDefId == **baseId(**resource_id)

fut14.baseId(1615613739)
5001003

[ar23]

ah...got it. sorry...my mistake. thanks a lot.

so something like this should print me the calculated assetId?

test = fut14.baseId(1615613739)

print (test)

thx again

[ar23]

if someone would like to do this just with a calculator.... :)
BaseId = ResourceId - (2^30 + (2^28 * 2))
ResourceId = BaseId + 2^30 + (2^28 * 2)

[ar23]

now i mostly get this errors when running my script. but sometimes it works...so there should not be a syntax error or sth. like that...

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Temp\fut14-master\itemsearch_a.py", line 33, in
bidding = fut.bid(trade_id, 200)
File "C:\Temp\fut14-master\fut14\core.py", line 326, in bid
rc = self.put(url, data=json.dumps(data))['auctionInfo'][0]
File "C:\Temp\fut14-master\fut14\core.py", line 259, in put
return self.request('PUT', url, _args, *_kwargs)
File "C:\Temp\fut14-master\fut14\core.py", line 241, in request
raise UnknownError(rc.str())
fut14.exceptions.UnknownError: {'code': '460', 'debug': '', 'reason': '', 'strin
g': 'Bad Request'}

@oczkers: any idea what could be the cause of this?
cant find an answer in the log...

[oczkers]

what exact parameters do you provide to searchauction?
how big interval?

[ar23]

items = fut.searchAuctions('development', assetId=5001003, page_size=50)

Maybe 2 to 3 Queries per 30 Sec.

[ar23]

i think setting a min & max price fixed this.....not sure why. I will verify this later on

[ar23]

working for me now.

does somebody have an idea how to run multiple scripts (with differnt accounts of course) parallel?

I'm currently running my scripts sequential. If you just start more than one script which accesses the fut.core components you'll get access denied errors - of course.
So I dont have a clue if it is possible to maybe install fut.core multiple times or if i have to just start multiple python threads (if the fut.core module could/would be cached that would be an option....)

[oczkers]

working for me now.

Nothing has changed so it has to be on server side.

So I dont have a clue if it is possible to maybe install fut.core multiple times or if i have to just start multiple python threads (if the fut.core module could/would be cached that would be an option....)

Are you trying to manage two separate accounts in one script?
It should be working if you create two separate session objects:

f1 = fut14.Core('email', 'password', 'secret answer')
f2 = fut14.Core('email', 'password', 'secret answer')

[ar23]

Adding a min & max price for the search query fixed this. so probably a server side change was applied the last few days.

I thought about running multiple scripts at the same time. because if i create two separate sessions in one script, i still can just query sequential, dont i?

but maybe defining two session objects could solve my issue, too. Dont know how the access on the modules is handled in python. Got access denied errors from core.py last time i tried to run two scripts parallel....
As soon as the servers are back I'll try.

Thank you!

[oczkers]

Adding a min & max price for the search query fixed this. so probably a server side change was applied the last few days.

are you getting Bad Request everytime you call searchAuction without min/max price and never where it's provided??

I thought about running multiple scripts at the same time. because if i create two separate sessions in one script, i still can just query sequential, dont i?

for example http://docs.python.org/2/library/threading.html