Checking type size is not enough

[futuresdr]

Checking type size is not enough

[bastibl]

Yes, this is true. There are, at least at the moment, many ways to shoot yourself in the foot, if you really want to. I spent quite some time to come up with an API that uses more strict typing, but it's really not as trivial as it may seem on first sight. If you have concrete suggests, your PR will be very much appreciated.

[bytesnake]

no I just started to read the source and stumbled on https://github.com/FutureSDR/FutureSDR/blob/main/src/blocks/fft.rs#L104 which made me take note here. It would be great to at least check that all downstream node's scalar are compatible to the input scalar of current node.

[bastibl]

You can cast the stream inputs and outputs to anything. That's not specific to this mutable reference to the input. It's the case for all stream connections.

A runtime check should be rather easy to implement by requiring any item type to implement Any and store the TypeId in the stream port. But that's just a runtime check... not sure if this is good enough for you.

[bytesnake]

A runtime check should be rather easy to implement by requiring any item type to implement Any and store the TypeId in the stream port. But that's just a runtime check... not sure if this is good enough for you.

that would definitely be the reasonable way to go 👍

[bastibl]

Implemented in ba57854.

Stream inputs/outputs are created with the actual type add_input::<T>("in")/add_output::<T>("out"). The actual ports remain non-generic, since only the any::TypeId of T is stored.

This TypeId is checked during connection and when casting the slice in work. There are also slice_unchecked versions, which ignore this check, since some blocks are, for example, easier to implement by casting it to a u8 slice in work.