These oahpa adjectives do not have +Pred forms (Bugzilla Bug 957)

[albbas]

These oahpa adjectives do not have +Pred forms (Bugzilla Bug 957)

[albbas]

Comment 3768

Date: 2011-02-22 10:16:31 +0100
From: Trond Trosterud <<trond.trosterud>>

~/gtsvn/gt/sma$cat dev/oahpa_adj.csv |sed 's/Attr/Pred/'|dsma|grep '?'
0%>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>100%
daaletje+A+Pred daaletje+A+Pred +?
dïeves+A+Pred dïeves+A+Pred +?
gaajhkenjevlien+A+Pred gaajhkenjevlien+A+Pred +?
gaavnoes+A+Pred gaavnoes+A+Pred +?
galmes+A+Pred galmes+A+Pred +?
gieries+A+Pred gieries+A+Pred +?
gårroeh+A+Pred gårroeh+A+Pred +?
gïemhpes+A+Pred gïemhpes+A+Pred +?
heejle+A+Pred heejle+A+Pred +?
håålesjimmie+A+Pred håålesjimmie+A+Pred +?
kroenes+A+Pred kroenes+A+Pred +?
luvregs+A+Pred luvregs+A+Pred +?
låabpoeh+A+Pred låabpoeh+A+Pred +?
njaalmeldh+A+Pred njaalmeldh+A+Pred +?
ohtjetje+A+Pred ohtjetje+A+Pred +?
ovmese+A+Pred ovmese+A+Pred +?
ovmessie+A+Pred ovmessie+A+Pred +?
seammaplïeres+A+Pred seammaplïeres+A+Pred +?
snjaltje+A+Pred snjaltje+A+Pred +?
åehpies+A+Pred åehpies+A+Pred +?
åelkies+A+Pred åelkies+A+Pred +?
åemie+A+Pred åemie+A+Pred +?
övtebe+A+Pred övtebe+A+Pred +?
mïevhkes+A+Pred mïevhkes+A+Pred +?
vïenes+A+Pred vïenes+A+Pred +?
stïeres+A+Pred stïeres+A+Pred +?
åålije+A+Pred åålije+A+Pred +?

So, perhaps they should?

[albbas]

Comment 3770

Date: 2011-02-22 10:45:58 +0100
From: Thomas Omma <<thomas.omma>>

dïeves dïeve+A+Pred
galmes galme+A+Pred
gïemhpes gïemhpe+A+Pred
övtebe övtebe+A+Comp+Predmïevhkes
mïevhke+A+Pred
åålije åålijes+A+Pred

Majja is the one šith spetscompetance on theese kind of stuff

[albbas]

Comment 3776

Date: 2011-02-23 11:14:19 +0100
From: Maja Lisa Kappfjell <<maja.l.kappfjell>>

svn ci -m "Corrected the attrbuttforms according to the bug #975, except of 'övtebe'" a_smanob.xml
Sending a_smanob.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 39741.

[albbas]

Comment 3789

Date: 2011-03-08 12:58:13 +0100
From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <<sjur.n.moshagen>>

Is it fixed now? Can it be closed?

[albbas]

Comment 3857

Date: 2011-04-22 16:33:15 +0200
From: Trond Trosterud <<trond.trosterud>>

AT least it is outdated, so yes, we close.

[albbas]

Comment 3933

Date: 2011-04-26 09:14:16 +0200
From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <<sjur.n.moshagen>>

Being outdated/old is not the same as being fixed. Reopened until confirmed. Thomas?

Don't close a bug before discussing it with the asignee or other stakeholders, or providing tests that documents that it has been fixed. Being old doesn't mean being irrelevant or obsolete.

[albbas]

Comment 3942

Date: 2011-04-27 09:30:15 +0200
From: Thomas Omma <<thomas.omma>>

jes, we close