[Discussion] `std.ZeroAddress`

[leohhhn]

[Discussion] `std.ZeroAddress`

[leohhhn]

We could have a "consts" stdlib or similar for this if we had more constants. Related.

I think std is the right place right now, and as soon as #1695 is merged, we can work on the split of std and have a separate place for it.

@thinhnx-var @linhpn99 - would you be open to doing a bit of research on the best way to do this? One solution is to simply have a constant that is std.Address(""), but possibly there is a better way where we actually utilize the address derivation system to generate something that would be akin of a zero address. It needs to not have a private key or similar. It should also be harmonious with std.Address.IsValid() in some way. Also, please think about the possible use cases and examples, and provide them along with the PR, so that the case for it is even stronger.

If you can, after doing the research, please post your suggested approach either here on in the PR description.

[moul]

Yes, the feature seems useful and will likely improve readability.

Just considering whether std is the most appropriate place. Perhaps we should explore ways to limit the size of the std API.

[thinhnx-var]

@leohhhn
yea I am working on this and will update our approach and implementation over here.

[grepsuzette]

Good idea.

Which is best:

• ZeroAddress
• AddressZero

AddressZero is more scary.
There's a movie called Patient Zero.

[linhpn99]

If we prioritize transaction transparency, approach 2 is likely the better method

[thinhnx-var]

@leohhhn :
In my view, we surely need ZeroAddress. This is the basis of tokens. I was suprised when I saw this issue :)
And I also think this implementation should be inspired by ETH 0x00 address.

[thinhnx-var]

@grepsuzette
I am thinking about (maybe) the best approach and you are giving me one more thing to put in mind. Cool :D