Strict types landing rover

[gnugat]

Strict types landing rover

[gnugat]

Hey @funivan, that's a good question! To answer it I'll just remind you that using strict types would raise a Fatal Error (Uncaught TypeError: Argument <argument number> passed to <function> must be of the type <expected type>, <received type> given).

I'm fine having these kind of fatal errors being raised when passing an invalid argument to a service (as you can see later in the series, like in Event constructor or in AnEventHappened), but when it comes to the entry point of our domain (the Command objects like LandRover) I'd rather have an InvalidArgumentException.

I hope that makes sense for you.

[funivan]

I understand your position. But what benefits you get when you use InvalidArgumentException instead of type error?

[gnugat]

Its mainly for error classification: let's say your logic is used in a HTTP application, an API. Then you only need to catch all InvalidArgumentException and return a 422 UNPROCESSABLE ENTITY response.

To be fair, instead of throwing \InvalidArgumentException it might be better to throw a custom MarsRover\Exception\ValidationFailedException.

[funivan]

Thanks. Error classification is good option to choose;)