gpt version, unreliable gpt output, parsing issues

[gpt-engineer-org]

gpt version, unreliable gpt output, parsing issues

[jebarpg]

@mwesterhof also check this post out #35 (comment) a couple of posts above that I actual address the same thing you are speaking about here with the formatting and agree that it needs to be corrected on the output of gpt side and not adapted to by a regex side.

Indeed. I think that the regex can be somewhat improved anyway (as I tried to do).

It's not just that GPT's output doesn't match the regex, it's that GPT appears to be all over the place regarding how it structures the output. Actually specifying the output formatting as part of the GPT query seems to be a solution. I'm not sure if it's the best solution, but we would need some way to have reliable output

It looks like we have found a good solution which will work for a variety of formats now. Lot more generic in it's regex capturing. We are waiting for this afternoon to create a PR to do some further testing on it but it looks very robust from my analysis.

[jebarpg]

@mwesterhof also check this post out #35 (comment)
a couple of posts above that I actual address the same thing you are speaking about here with the formatting and agree that it needs to be corrected on the output of gpt side and not adapted to by a regex side.

[mwesterhof]

@mwesterhof also check this post out #35 (comment) a couple of posts above that I actual address the same thing you are speaking about here with the formatting and agree that it needs to be corrected on the output of gpt side and not adapted to by a regex side.

Indeed. I think that the regex can be somewhat improved anyway (as I tried to do).

It's not just that GPT's output doesn't match the regex, it's that GPT appears to be all over the place regarding how it structures the output. Actually specifying the output formatting as part of the GPT query seems to be a solution. I'm not sure if it's the best solution, but we would need some way to have reliable output

[jebarpg]

@mwesterhof #35 (comment)

[patillacode]

A lot of progress has been made since this was posted.

If you wish to reopen the issue please do following the new issue template.