BSD or MIT

[graphql]

BSD or MIT

[oreno4649]

@JoelMarcey @caniszczyk Thank you for your reaction.

I make the PR. Please check the license notation.

[leebyron]

Projects have been moving to MIT on a case by case basis. @JoelMarcey, perhaps you could help us investigate this?

[JoelMarcey]

Hmmm.. many times the documentation for our projects are licensed as Creative Commons - e.g., https://github.com/facebook/Docusaurus/blob/master/LICENSE-docs

And we don't have that clause listed on the site.

Would the docs being CC be ok?

[JoelMarcey]

@oreno4649 - Since this issue was originally raised, GraphQL has moved to the Linux foundation. I believe this should be licensed to MIT, and we just missed it, but I will let @leebyron or @caniszczyk make that call.

[caniszczyk]

MIT is fine

…

On May 22, 2019, at 7:13 PM, Joel Marcey ***@***.***> wrote: @oreno4649 - Since this issue was originally raised, GraphQL has moved to the Linux foundation. I believe this should be licensed to MIT, and we just missed it, but I will let @leebyron or @caniszczyk make that call. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[oreno4649]

The LICENSE file says that it is not BSD or MIT.
How is the actual document licensed?

[Urigo]

This can be closed, we are now MIT: #1104