Results incorrect at finite redshift and w!=-1

[halomod]

Results incorrect at finite redshift and w!=-1

[steven-murray]

Thanks very much. Don't happen to have some time on your hands to write a routine to do this do you?

[tijmen]

I do not, sorry.

[steven-murray]

OK, fair enough.

I guess I will get to it eventually then!

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:01 AM, tijmen [email protected] wrote:

I do not, sorry.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#19 (comment).

[steven-murray]

I have worked on this in b639665.

My solution is to use the growth factor as determined by CAMB, rather than re-inventing the wheel.

I would be very interested in your opinion on whether this works well enough.

The new growth factor model will be used by default if you are using wCDM cosmology and have pycamb installed. Otherwise, to use it, set growth_model="CambGrowth" when instantiating.

[tijmen]

Thanks for updating the implementation and posting about it. How accurate the redshift dependence of the halo mass function is under this method is an interesting science question, but this certainly seems like a very reasonable first order approach (it is the one that we used for the wCDM SPT cluster cosmology analysis).

[steven-murray]

Excellent. I will keep it as is, and if you have any other suggestions in the future, please let me know!