Apache 2 Compliance

[hugs]

Apache 2 Compliance

[penguinho]

Maybe this is the time to have a conversation about what license should really be on this. I'm looking for something free/open and non-viral. Anyone have a favorite?

Dan Cuellar
Lead Software Engineer - Test Team | Zoosk
989 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94103
+1 415 857 BUGS (2847) | [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

On Thursday, November 15, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Jason Carr wrote:

Apache 2 requires that you have a LICENSE file, a NOTICE file, and a License header on each source file.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
I think we need to:
1: Add a NOTICE File
2: Fix the copyright attribution(s)
3: Add the header to all the source files in the repo.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/hugs/appium/issues/13).

[maudineormsby]

My favorite is Apache 2. I think we have the right license, we just need to apply it properly. I'd love to hear if there are any other opinions though.

[hugs]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Dan Cuellar [email protected] wrote:

Maybe this is the time to have a conversation about what license should
really be on this.

No, it's not. :-)

I'm looking for something free/open and non-viral. Anyone
have a favorite?

Apache2 looks long, but in effect, it's basically as free, open, and
non-viral as BSD & MIT are. It's just that the Apache2 license takes
pages and pages to deal explicitly with patents.

Footnote to history: Android is Apache2. It really is a good license.
http://source.android.com/source/licenses.html

• hugs

[penguinho]

So it sounds like we're in agreement that we should correct how we apply the apache2 license.

Dan Cuellar
Lead Software Engineer - Test Team | Zoosk
989 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94103
+1 415 857 BUGS (2847) | [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])

On Friday, November 16, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jason Huggins wrote:

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Dan Cuellar <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:

Maybe this is the time to have a conversation about what license should
really be on this.

No, it's not. :-)

I'm looking for something free/open and non-viral. Anyone
have a favorite?

Apache2 looks long, but in effect, it's basically as free, open, and
non-viral as BSD & MIT are. It's just that the Apache2 license takes
pages and pages to deal explicitly with patents.

Footnote to history: Android is Apache2. It really is a good license.
http://source.android.com/source/licenses.html

• hugs

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (https://github.com/hugs/appium/issues/13#issuecomment-10459691).