Contact: let's share efforts to implement 'mxgraph-type-definitions'

[hungtcs]

Contact: let's share efforts to implement 'mxgraph-type-definitions'

[hungtcs]

Hi @tbouffard! #2 is merged. And my local project has some uncommitted changes to the shape module, which are now merged.

[hungtcs]

Hi @tbouffard,
The content of this repository is currently very imperfect, most of these files comes from mxGraph API Specification, I don't have any special maintenance, just supplement it when I need to use the missing parts.

It's a great honor to work with you, what should I do now? I have no experience of working with other people on GitHub.

[tbouffard]

hello @hungtcs
good news

For now, there is nothing special to do on the repository on your side (in the following I added links to the GitHub help in case you need information about the way contributions can be done).

I am going to fork it, do some changes and propose a pull request that you would be able to review and eventually merge into your repository

As 1st attempt, I am going to have a look at the shape folder.

[tbouffard]

1st contribution now available for review and discussion, see #2

[tbouffard]

@hungtcs thanks again for the merge

I have started an effort to have mxGraph TypeScript available through DefinitelyTyped, see https://github.com/process-analytics/mxgraph-road-to-DefinitelyTyped
Will you ok to join me on this?

I have proposed your repository as the working place to implement the definitions, I guess that for now, this shouldn't change anything for you except that you may receive more contributions and some discussions may happen about the definitions implementation

[hungtcs]

@tbouffard My pleasure 😃

[tbouffard]

Great, I have udpated the readme of the followup repo.
I close his PR as we are done on this subject.