New feature request: ODBC connection support with itoolkit_lite

[ibm]

New feature request: ODBC connection support with itoolkit_lite

[kadler]

Original comment by Jesse G (Bitbucket: ThePrez, GitHub: ThePrez).

---

Closing, as this has been added with the iODBCCall class

[kadler]

Original comment by Aaron Bartell (Bitbucket: aaronbartell, GitHub: aaronbartell).

---

So, you can re-fork or talk with Aaron to get "On The Plan" so you can edit this master directly.

@ThePrez, you are now an admin.

[kadler]

Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).

---

Ops, I see you already forked. So, you can re-fork or talk with Aaron to get "On The Plan" so you can edit this master directly.

BTW -- I would add you to list of admins, but i can't recall how in bitbucket (shameful, but moving on).

[kadler]

Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).

---

I like the idea of a separate transport. Let's do that. You can assign ownership to me. I'd like to do this one.

ok, i started odbc driver transport in directory itoolkit/odbc (now commit in repository). Have fun.

[kadler]

Original comment by Jesse G (Bitbucket: ThePrez, GitHub: ThePrez).

---

I like the idea of a separate transport. Let's do that.
You can assign ownership to me. I'd like to do this one.

[kadler]

Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).

---

Jesse, Please use new transport class iODBCCall. Do you just want me to do iODBCCall for you quickly? Do you want to do it yourself for fun???

[kadler]

Original comment by Jesse G (Bitbucket: ThePrez, GitHub: ThePrez).

---

Forgot to include the PEP0249 spec link for convenience. https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/

I suspect we really want to just go straight to the cursor execute() function.

I'd gladly take a stab at the code if we agree this is a suitable design change, but it would be in January sometime.