Support GitHub Flavored Markdown's Triple Tick for code blocks.

[danott]

Support GitHub Flavored Markdown's Triple Tick for code blocks.

[lukeholder]

+1 NEED.

[FichteFoll]

I think this is essential and I use the syntax-highlighted block code for many things. If I were to use gist.io I would probably miss this feature.

[jdickey]

I use Gists extensively (usually private Gists to teammates) to illustrate snippets of code that aren't "worth" pushing a "breadcrumb" to the repo. This problem is why I can't use gist.io for my main Gist use case.

[gavinblair]

+1

[danott]

HTML Pipeline is what is used, if anyone wants to get started on a fork. I would, but don't have the time in the immediate future.

[jdickey]

@danott Link text correct, but the actual link leads somewhere else; here's a link to the repo.

[danott]

@jdickey yep, definitely did my markdown link backwards. Fixed now

[azat-co]

+1 code blocks are not rendered: http://gist.io/5955726

[idan]

Fixed in: 0252440

Example: http://gist.io/6225505

[FichteFoll]

Oh, that was easier than I expected.

Edit: After testing with a language set it seems that gist.io is missing CSS definitions for the syntax highlighting. Would it be possible to include these?

Example: http://gist.io/6227075 (inspect HTML)

[danott]

@idan 💯 YEAH!