Better support for ES6 Iterators

[immutable-js]

Better support for ES6 Iterators

[magnushiie]

Should the typings of Iterable<K, V> be updated to include the method?

[Symbol.iterator](): Iterator<T>;

I'm not sure this is the right way for 2 reasons:

• The Symbol symbol is declared only for TypeScript ES6 target - for backwards compatibility, should SymbolConstructor and Symbol be defined in immutable.d.ts also?
• From source it seems KeyedIterable returns entries() instead of values(), so the type of it is different. Maybe it's enough to override the iterable method in Iterable.Keyed to return the appropriate type instead.

[leebyron]

0164a55 Adds Iterator methods to Vector, Map, Set, OrderedMap

[leebyron]

049eff1 Adds ES6 Symbol.iterator polyfill

[jsilvestre]

Hi,

I'm not sure it's the right place to ask/tell but I've tried to use orderedMap.values() but the result does not seem to have a done property nor next() method. Is it a bug or am I just misusing it?

Thanks.

[leebyron]

Hey Joseph, what version are you using?—
Sent from Mailbox

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Joseph Silvestre
[email protected] wrote:

Hi,
I'm not sure it's the right place to ask/tell but I've tried to use orderedMap.values() but the result does not seem to have a done property nor next() method. Is it a bug or am I just misusing it?

Thanks.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#68 (comment)

[jsilvestre]

Sorry, I've tried the latest one, 2.0.16

[voodoohop]

is there any way to create a lazy Sequence directly from an ES6 generator?

[leebyron]

Not yet, but I have that on my short list!—
Sent from Mailbox

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:54 PM, voodoohop [email protected]
wrote:

is there any way to create a lazy Sequence directly from an ES6 generator?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#68 (comment)

[leebyron]

As of v2.3.0, all Sequences can be iterated and all collections can be constructed from an Iterator or Iterable.

[samwgoldman]

From source it seems KeyedIterable returns entries() instead of values()

You hit the nail on the head here. This is the real issue with making the base class iterable. Consider the following function:

function f(iter: Iterable<A,B>): Array<?> {
  out = [];
  for (let x of iter) {
    out.push(x);
  }
  return out;
}

What type belongs in ?? If I pass a KeyedIterable, it would be [K,V], if I pass anything else, it would be V.

[magnushiie]

It seems then that Immutable.Iterable itself should not be Iterable in the ES6 sense (as defined in lib.core.es6.d.ts), because its type is ill-defined. Instead, Iterable.Indexed and Iterable.Keyed should be ES6-iterable. It's bit of a pain because the Iterable methods like map aren't typed as returning this, but it would still be better than nothing.