Adding addtional return fields

[imperva]

Adding addtional return fields

[gabibeyo]

Hope I understand your question.

as you can see from the documentation, the field can be free strings for both requests and responses.
Where ever you see FieldType enum you can instead use your custom String.

Let me know if I answered your question.

[aram535]

Yes I did see that and that is what I tried, but the field kept coming back empty - figured I was doing something wrong there. Figured out the bug in my debug, thank you for your reply.

[aram535]

Let me ask a follow up question, and please let me know if you like this in a new issue. I'm now trying to filter on the extra field so that I don't have to get extra entries but looks like the pattern doesn't match the factory.

    Sentence sentence = queryAssembler.addPhrase(FieldType.EMAIL, PhraseOperator.CONTAINS, "email")
                                      .addPhrase(FieldType.DEPARTMENT, PhraseOperator.EQUAL, "IT")
                                      .closeSentence(SentenceOperator.AND);

Works, however:

    Sentence sentence = queryAssembler.addPhrase(FieldType.EMAIL, PhraseOperator.CONTAINS, "email")
                                      .addPhrase("someotherField", PhraseOperator.EQUAL, "foo")
                                      .closeSentence(SentenceOperator.AND);

Causes a compile error Description

The method addPhrase(FieldType, PhraseOperator, String) in the type QueryAssembler is not applicable for the arguments (String, PhraseOperator, String)

[gabibeyo]

I can see that, I will look into that and update you asap.
We will probably need to release a fixed version.

I will keep you updated.

[gabibeyo]

@aram535 , I think I fixed that, also tested it in my environment.
The changes are committed in this branch (still not in master):
https://github.com/imperva/domain-directory-controller/tree/enable_query_by_fieldtype_string

Can you please clone this branch, compile and test it in your environment?
The version I used for this branch is 7.3.3.0.1.0, so you can point to it in your project.

Once you validate it I will release a fix

[aram535]

Yes the query looks like exactly what I needed:
'(&(&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user))(identitylifecyclestate=*active*)(mail=*[email protected]*))'

[gabibeyo]

Perfect. I will release an official version in the next weeks.
Meanwhile you can work with this one. Let me know if you have any other questions.

[davidkhanpk]

I am trying to get name of the group. I tried every field type and common strings related to name but I can't get the name of the group.

queryRequestGroup.setObjectType(ObjectType.GROUP); queryRequestGroup.addRequestedField(FieldType.EMAIL);

I can get the email but unable to get the group name.

[gabibeyo]

Hi @davidkhanpk ,

Try:
queryRequestGroup.addRequestedField(FieldType.COMMON_NAME);
OR
queryRequestGroup.addRequestedField("displayName");

Please let me know...