Comments (14)
The player should be creating "hard" saves at regular intervals. If they mess up a quick save, then they could fall back onto a "hard" save.
from openjk.
Should be doesn't mean that they are. I think many users would really appreciate this feature. I know I would.
from openjk.
I'd agree with Camron on this. I usually don't support mechanisms designed to protect the stupid.
If you are dense enough not to properly save and mess up your quicksave, you deserve to start the level over.
from openjk.
Because screwing players over is nice? No. In no way does this hurt anybody, it just helps. I do not approve of your Elitist stance. Try to love and tolerate some more.
from openjk.
Well played, sir.
Regardless, I'm the "remove the warning labels and let natural selection do the rest" sort of person. If I spend hours playing Civilization and then decide to quit without saving, Sid Meier didn't make me lose all of my progress. I did because I was too dense. People should accept responsibility for their idiotic mistakes. I've lost progress before. It taught me to save regularly. When you are doing paid work, you need to be in the habit of saving regularly. Video games taught me that.
It isn't so much elitist as "grow up and take care of yourself" sort of stance. That is not directed at you personally, of course, but at ignorant users who blame their actions (or lack thereof) on the developers.
True, it wouldn't hurt anyone. The concept of it just seems rather silly to me. More importantly, how many quicksaves would be allowed? Why not just do a regular save? A regular save is only one keystroke and 3 clicks away. I don't think I've ever really bothered to quicksave. The autosave at the start of each map and the checkpoints have always sufficed.
All of that said, I am not really a code contributor and will probably never be able to provide anything more useful than some (extensive) testing and bug hunting. I voice my opinions, but really don't have any right to be bothered by what actual contributors such as yourself choose to do. I'm seeing an update of my favorite FPS. Who am I to complain?
from openjk.
Let's not forget the most obvious reason why this is a bit of a bad idea: needs new assets. I agree with Cameron and all the others. The game is already stupidly easy as it is, and it has not one, not two, but THREE different methods of saving. Why add more? If you've put yourself in a bad situation, that's your own fault really.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: cadika-orademailto:[email protected]
Sent: 4/15/2013 11:39 AM
To: Razish/OpenJKmailto:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenJK] Have multiple quicksaves (#78)
Well played, sir.
Regardless, I'm the "remove the warning labels and let natural selection do the rest" sort of person. If I spend hours playing Civilization and then decide to quit without saving, Sid Meier didn't make me lose all of my progress. I did because I was too dense. People should accept responsibility for their idiotic mistakes. I've lost progress before. It taught me to save regularly. When you are doing paid work, you need to be in the habit of saving regularly. Video games taught me that.
It isn't so much elitist as "grow up and take care of yourself" sort of stance. That is not directed at you personally, of course, but at ignorant users who blame their actions (or lack thereof) on the developers.
True, it wouldn't hurt anyone. The concept of it just seems rather silly to me. More importantly, how many quicksaves would be allowed? Why not just do a regular save? A regular save is only one keystroke and 3 clicks away. I don't think I've ever really bothered to quicksave. The autosave at the start of each map and the checkpoints have always sufficed.
All of that said, I am not really a code contributor and will probably never be able to provide anything more useful than some (extensive) testing and bug hunting. I voice my opinions, but really don't have any right to be bothered by what actual contributors such as yourself choose to do. I'm seeing an update of my favorite FPS. Who am I to complain?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#78 (comment)
from openjk.
Just how would this need new assets? And why are you all so anti-player?
from openjk.
I don't know. Maybe we're masochists who like playing Minecraft on "hardcore" mode and like games with perma-death.
I'm not anti-player. I'm anti-moron. As @eezstreet points out, what good would be a fourth method of saving your game?
Though, I am curious. What new assets would be needed?
from openjk.
The good would be a reduction in player frustration. What bad would it do?
from openjk.
We could also decrease player frustration by making godmode active by default.
There really isn't much purpose in making a game easier. Personally, I like a tiny bit of challenge. Not that JA really offers much challenge, but I spend most of my playtime orchestrating huge battles or building elaborate scenarios.
You could make the game auto-save every time you took a step. At that point, you could effectively rewind every conflict until you make it through without ever being hit.
To be honest, I'd be more interested in adding perma-death. There's something special about having your save deleted after your character dies. It fosters a greater emotional connection with the game.
from openjk.
Creating backup-quicksaves and adding perma-death are not mutually exclusive, you know? Feel free to open a new issue about perma-death.
from openjk.
You make a valid point, sir. I just might.
It feels more like something that should be in a mod than in the central code, though. I have lots of ideas of things to add, but I read somewhere around here that OpenJK is not trying to significantly change core gameplay.
from openjk.
Personally, I'm fine with adding optional new functionality, as long as the option to play the game as it originally was is kept. Discussing that kind of thing is exactly what that issue could be used for though.
from openjk.
Implying I'm anti-player
I'm more anti-idiocy than anything. And by new assets, I mean new menu stuff that needs added.
There's already a "multiple quick save" feature -> its called regular saving. Which you can do with pressing a bind, and hitting "save game". This feature would be absolutely pointless
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Willi Schinmeyermailto:[email protected]
Sent: 4/15/2013 1:26 PM
To: Razish/OpenJKmailto:[email protected]
Cc: eezstreetmailto:[email protected]
Subject: Re: [OpenJK] Have multiple quicksaves (#78)
Personally, I'm fine with adding optional new functionality, as long as the option to play the game as it originally was is kept. Discussing that kind of thing is exactly what that issue could be used for though.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#78 (comment)
from openjk.
Related Issues (20)
- Cutscenes failing to play correctly HOT 2
- [Just a warning] OpenJO - "Where to find?!" HOT 4
- [OpenJO] Elevator Stuck (Soft Lock) HOT 6
- OpenJO - EAX Effects Not Working HOT 3
- Included gsl-lite fails to compile with g++-13 13.2.0 HOT 3
- [OpenJK] Dynamic Glow broken? HOT 17
- UBSAN multiplayer
- ASAN/UBSAN single player
- Replace SP cvars with XCVAR method HOT 1
- Rend2 out-of-bounds write while outside the map in the negative direction. HOT 1
- Error "Could not open string package 'CON_TEXT'" HOT 1
- Problem with cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/path/to/GameData .. HOT 2
- Script to download and build Star Wars Jedi Knight II: Jedi Outcast Demo on Mac , Linux or FreeBSD
- Traditional Chinese language support issue of OpenJO (Jedi Outcast) HOT 1
- Please tell me how to install Jedi Outcast (Ubuntu arm64) HOT 4
- Failed to load renderer HOT 2
- Rend2 is not correctly building when cross compiling using mingw from Linux to Windows x64 due to compact_glsl issues
- OpenJK SP interacting with UI/menu breaks sound HOT 6
- Enabling lightsaber only and disable force in multiplayer doesn't work HOT 3
- Question regarding modelscale in Multiplayer
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from openjk.