Move the "blog listing logic" out of index.jade

[jnordberg]

Move the "blog listing logic" out of index.jade

[vitch]

I had a little look into this to see if I could figure out how to implement it myself and I have created a wintersmith-archive plugin:

https://github.com/vitch/wintersmith-archive

I've never written coffee script before so it's quite possibly a dumb implementation (not understanding coffee script made it tricky for me to get my head around the wintersmith sourcecode as well). But hopefully it is a starting point to discuss whether it is possible to move logic from templates into a ContentPlugin

To use add to your project and then reference in config.json. Now you can replace contents/archive.md from the default example install with contents/archive.json containing the following:

{
  "template": "archive.jade",
  "filename": "archive.html"
}

Then templates/archive.jade becomes:

extends layout

block content

  section.archive
    ul
      each dateData in sortedArticleDates
        li.year= dateData.year
        ul
          each month in dateData.months
            li
              strong= articlesByDate[dateData.year][month].monthName
              each article in articlesByDate[dateData.year][month].articles
                br
                a(href=article.url)= article.title

What do you think? Do you like the idea of making the templates dumber and simpler and having any required logic in a ContentPlugin?

[joefiorini]

@vitch I just went through this myself. I ended up hacking wintersmith-swig to allow me to pass a custom filters module, then created a file with swig filters to handle most of the logic that is currently done in the Jade template. I'd be happy to share some of the code here next time I'm at my computer; don't have access to it right now unfortunately. Would that help?

[joefiorini]

@vitch Also, your plugin looks good as long as I want the specific configuration (sorted by date, etc) you return. My solution allows you to define that in your app. However, it's not very "wintersmithy" whereas yours is, so maybe we can find a way to combine approaches?

[vitch]

@joefiorini I actually moved to DocPad in the meantime... This was one of the problems I ran into while evaluating wintersmith so I decided to have a looks at some other options and I'm currently preferring that...

Agree that my plugin is limited to the specific requirements at hand. It would be great to have it configurable in some manner (rather than a separate plugin for each way you want to slice the data)...

[jnordberg]

#56

[jnordberg]

Fixed in 2.0, now everything is PERFECT! ⛵