Add example value annotation for primitive types

[joffrey-bion]

Add example value annotation for primitive types

[ST-DDT]

Actually I would go for a more types.

If the value is presented as String you could always fake parse/raw copy it to the target type:

ValueType.DETECT = Default setting, attempt to guess the value type based on the annotated field
ValueType.STRING = Just use the string as string. (For Strings and enums)
ValueType.INTEGER = For Integers/Longs and BigInteger(?)
ValueType.FLOAT/DECIMAL = For Float/Double and BigDecimal(?)
ValueType.RAW = For some complex data without proper data schema. (ex Map<String,Object>)

(EDIT: Actually INTEGER, FLOAT/DECIMAL and RAW could be combined to just one because they behave the same)

@interface ApiExample {

    String value();

    ValueType type() default ValueType.DETECT;

}

There is no need to actualy parse the example value as it can be just printed using @JsonRawValue (maybe ValueType.STRING needs automatically added extra quotes).

[joffrey-bion]

Funny that you mention inserting a JSON value, because I thought about it right after posting this issue.

That being said, I'm not sure how much value this brings to the users, especially for complex objects with many fields. I really wanted them to be able to write new MyThing(param1, param2) as default value, and their customized Jackson mapper would have done the serialization job, but annotations don't permit that, which is a pity.

The JSON value approach has a few drawbacks:

• it forces users to write JSON, which is inconvenient, especially for big objects
• it forces users to maintain the example JSONs each time they customize their Jackson configuration (dates, enums, arrays...)
• if we don't want to force the users to write formatted JSON, we would need to deserialize the JSON into an object of the right class (to respect Jackson config properly), and then serialize it back to JSON. This is a problem to me because users don't necessary want to write deserializable classes if serialization is enough. This behaviour could be changed via a Livedoc setting, though.

Because of this, I'm not sure we should add complexity to Livedoc if there is no real value added. That being said, these drawbacks are not that important considering that providing example JSON for objects should be occasional and not a practice users should apply all over the code base. That's why I may consider it anyway when creating the annotation(s).

Regarding @JsonRawValue, where do you think we could use it? Livedoc template objects are all maps or primitives, so there is no place to put this annotation, unless we deserialize to a declared class. However, in that case, it would be in the user's classes, and this would affect production behaviour, not only the doc. Did you have an idea in particular? Or were you merely pointing at the feature, just in case?

[joffrey-bion]

I also thought about maybe allowing Livedoc to instantiate the object using a no-arg constructor if present. This could be specified via an annotation, or maybe be the default behaviour instead of exploring properties.

For instance, Livedoc could try to find a no-arg constructor on the class, and if not found, fallback to the current behaviour of exploring properties and creating a Map<String, Object>. That way, Livedoc would respect their Jackson config as much as possible.