set-output is going to be deprecated in 2023

[johanvanhelden]

set-output is going to be deprecated in 2023

[johanvanhelden]

Great to hear you like the action.

If you would be able to PR the modification, I'd really appreciate it! Thanks!

[johanvanhelden]

The fix has been released, thanks @jospapePAQT !

[pfy-oleksii-storozhylov]

No warnings anymore, but I have empty value while trying to access coverage and other values

${{ steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}

[jospapePAQT]

No warnings anymore, but I have empty value while trying to access coverage and other values

${{ steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}

it is now stored in $GITHUB_OUTPUT

echo "${{ env.steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}" # This will output the coverage

[jospapePAQT]

UP

[greatislander]

No warnings anymore, but I have empty value while trying to access coverage and other values

${{ steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}

it is now stored in $GITHUB_OUTPUT

echo "${{ env.steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}" # This will output the coverage

The README is not up to date anymore.

[pfy-oleksii-storozhylov]

No warnings anymore, but I have empty value while trying to access coverage and other values

${{ steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}

it is now stored in $GITHUB_OUTPUT

echo "${{ env.steps.coverage.outputs.coverage }}" # This will output the coverage

It doesn't work for me as well :(
Also in docs I found that env. should not be used for getting output step value https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-commands-for-github-actions#example-3
But the weird thing they propose to use (and it works for me)

echo "SELECTED_COLOR=green" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

But in action logs I see output with ## symbols:

##"coverage=99.438202247191" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

[johanvanhelden]

@pfy-oleksii-storozhylov @greatislander @jospapePAQT

Apologies for the late response. Due to personal reasons I was unable to work on this sooner.

I have now pushed the fixes to the action in #13.

The README on how to use the output remains correct. It was simply a faulty implementation of setting the output in #11

So any new runs of the workflow should show proper output again, as you can see here:
https://github.com/johanvanhelden/gha-clover-test-coverage-check/actions/runs/3558639385/jobs/5977451791