9.11 additional functions clash

[jowr]

9.11 additional functions clash

[jowr]

Shouldn't we just rermove src/PASS_FTN_ALT.f from the sources?

[ibell]

Yes that would probably do it, but only if the REFPROP version is >=9.11

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorrit Wronski [email protected]
wrote:

Shouldn't we just rermove src/PASS_FTN_ALT.f from the sources?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31 (comment).

Excluding it from the compilation process using the makefile would be better, I think, if the file is still distributed with REFPROP 9.11. Doing so, you don't delete it, and you don't need to comment the lines out.

[jowr]

Oh, that is what I meant: Remove it from the list of files to compile - not deleting it.

OK ! :-) ; Does somebody have a REFPROP 9.11 to test the code after the makefile has been modified? It seems that Ian has it. Do you also have a version at hand, Jorrit? Personally, I don't, but I can make the modification and make a pull request, as long as one of you test the code after that :-).