Incorporate the changes from @pahihu to support Java 11 and Java 17

[1997tn]

Incorporate the changes from @pahihu to support Java 11 and Java 17

[cfbsoftware]

See: pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2

That document is for another compiler. It doesn't apply to gpcp!

pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2 has now been corrected at my request, confirming that the document does in fact apply to GPCP.

[cfbsoftware]

p/s: This commit should be skipped: pahihu/gpcp-JVM@116c8c8 as that document has nothing to do with gpcp: pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2

I disagree. The document gives additional information about the latest changes that were made to the CP language not a specific implementation of CP. On the contrary, it has much to do with GPCP as most, if not all, of those changes were implemented in GPCP.

[1997tn]

p/s: This commit should be skipped: pahihu/gpcp-JVM@116c8c8 as that document has nothing to do with gpcp: pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2

I disagree. The document gives additional information about the latest changes that were made to the CP language not a specific implementation of CP. On the contrary, it has much to do with GPCP as most, if not all, of those changes were implemented in GPCP.

I disagree with you. If the changes were already implemented, that document is OK. But the fact is they are not yet implemented, that document only causes confusion to the users.

[cfbsoftware]

I disagree with you. If the changes were already implemented, that document is OK. But the fact is they are not yet implemented, that document only causes confusion to the users.

Fact??? There seems to be some misunderstanding here. Which changes are you saying have not been implemented?

[1997tn]

I disagree with you. If the changes were already implemented, that document is OK. But the fact is they are not yet implemented, that document only causes confusion to the users.

Fact??? There seems to be some misunderstanding here. Which changes are you saying have not been implemented?

See: pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2

That document is for another compiler. It doesn't apply to gpcp!

@proberon Could you make a PR for this? It seems you are an enthusiast.

[pahihu]

Hi, Since my repo is not forked from the original, making a PR from it is a bit problematic. I have attached patch files, which contains the changes. Apply them in numerical order. Regards, Andras Pahi

…

On 2023. Nov 24., at 10:10, tqo50396 ***@***.***> wrote: @proberon <https://github.com/proberon> Could you make a PR for this? It seems you are an enthusiast. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#22 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADTEB2Y5NY6UH3SOH2ENPPDYGBP6RAVCNFSM6AAAAAATS65C2GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMRVGM2TKMRYGY>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[k-john-gough]

Hi Chris I have suddenly become aware of this discussion thread. I don’t really understand what the issues are, so perhaps you could find time to give me a short summary? Regards John From: Chris Burrows ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, January 6, 2023 11:26 PM To: k-john-gough/gpcp ***@***.***> Cc: K John Gough ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [k-john-gough/gpcp] Incorporate the changes from @pahihu to support Java 11 and Java 17 (Issue #22) p/s: This commit should be skipped: ***@***.***<pahihu/gpcp-JVM@116c8c8> as that document has nothing to do with gpcp: pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2<pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2> I disagree. The document gives additional information about the latest changes that were made to the CP language not a specific implementation of CP. On the contrary, it has much to do with GPCP as most, if not all, of those changes were implemented in GPCP. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#22 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEC5EFAUMAFGT3ZXH7QAKSTWRAMNVANCNFSM6AAAAAATS65C2E>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>

[cfbsoftware]

Hi John, The part of this issue that you referred to is already closed: pahihu/gpcp-JVM#2 I am not familiar with the JVM version of GPCP so am unable to help with that part of this issue, Cheers, Chris