Core dump when repeatedly `unmailboxes` and `mailboxes = [something]`

[Ron89]

Core dump when repeatedly `unmailboxes` and `mailboxes = [something]`

[shioyama]

This is an issue with the version of the sidebar that is used in mutt-kz. I'd suggest giving neomutt a try intead, it has mutt-kz changes incorporated in it and also has the fixed sidebar. I created an aur package for it just now which should be a near-drop-in replacement for mutt-kz.

[shioyama]

p.s. see #124

[Ron89]

Noted, will try. Thanks~

[karelzak]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 06:04:52AM -0700, Chris Salzberg wrote:

This is an issue with the version of the sidebar that is used in
mutt-kz.

mutt-kz version 1.6.0.1 is based on sidebar from neomutt

I'd suggest giving neomutt a try
intead, it has mutt-kz changes incorporated in it and also has the
fixed sidebar. I created an aur package for
it just now which
should be a near-drop-in replacement for mutt-kz.

right now there is no difference between neo-mutt and mutt-kz. (Well,
neo-mutt contains some another extensions).

The goal of the neo-mutt project is keep up to date unofficial mutt
changes (and if possible then push to the mutt upstream). The goal of
mutt-kz is to develop and maintain notmuch support. The plan is to
collaborate to keep things synced.

Karel

Karel Zak [email protected]
http://karelzak.blogspot.com

[Ron89]

I haven't seen the code relating sidebar. But neovim's sidebar is working pretty stable even when I frequently <change-folder>. Could you check on this if you have the time?

[flatcap]

@shioyama
Thanks for creating the Arch package. I have some questions...

• What can I do to NeoMutt to help you?
• Are you going to continue maintaining the package?
• I looked at the package and it seems to pull directly from git. How much work would it be to only use "official" releases (those date-tagged)?
• Would a floating "latest-release" tag be useful?
• Do you mind if I name you on the NeoMutt website and link to the package? (You can be the first entry on the Packagers page).
• How can we get more Arch users using NeoMutt?

Cheers,
Rich [email protected]

[shioyama]

@flatcap About the package, I'll continue maintaining it as long as I'm using it, unless someone else wants to (happy to hand it over to anyone else).

I looked at the package and it seems to pull directly from git. How much work would it be to only use "official" releases (those date-tagged)?

I just wanted something quick so based it off git but really it should probably be named neomutt-git and another package neomutt should only have official releases. I'm happy to swap those around.

Would a floating "latest-release" tag be useful?

I don't think that's necessary, the package would anyway need to be updated manually if it's not simply pulling from the neomutt branch.

Do you mind if I name you on the NeoMutt website and link to the package?

Not at all! But again, I did very little, just took the existing mutt-kz-git package and tweaked it a bit.

How can we get more Arch users using NeoMutt?

Make Mutt great and people will use it 😄 I think there's a lot of work going on in parallel so I quite like your attempt to pull things together into one place.

[karelzak]

I guess the issue is already fixed, close?

[flatcap]

You created a fix for this. Then I changed sidebar a bit to get rid of some dodgy code.
You've already merged the improved version.

Yes, close this issue. I'm confident the bug is fixed.